From thought to action : employee work engagement and job performance
By Evangelia Demerouti, Russell S. Cropanzano. 2010
497 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6cebd3dd722df7f9739f6eda3bf6a30e4d4f7923
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Arnold B. Bakker
- Wilmar B. Schaufeli
- Evangelia Demerouti
- Simon Albrecht
- M. Tims
- B. Shuck
- A. Saks
- J. Hakanen
Citations in the corpus
- Antecedents to Employee Engagement (2011, background): “Some evidence does suggest that poorly appropriated monetary structures can undermine organizational engagement efforts (Demerouti & Cropanzano, 2010; Sparrow & Balain, 2010).”
- How work engagement relates to performance and absenteeism: a meta-analysis (2021, background): “The motivationrelated process refers to what employees will do (Demerouti & Cropanzano, 2010) which relates to reasons (a), (c) and (d).”
- Achieving employee wellbeing in a changing work environment An expert commentary on current scholarship (2012, background): “Despite the compelling evidence regarding the positive consequences of employee engagement and the harmful consequences of employee disengagement (Demerouti and Cropanzano, 2010; Shirom, 2010), a recent review concluded that to date very few field interventions to improve work engagement exist and…”
- Mind the mindset! The interaction of proactive personality, transformational leadership and growth mindset for engagement at work (2018, background): “…are considered to be a valuable addition to the organization, as they are committed to their organization’s goals and values (Schaufeli and Bakker, 2004) and can contribute to their organization’s success, for example, by in-role and extra-role performance (Demerouti and Cropanzano, 2010).”
- The Impact of Employee Engagement on Job Performance and Organisational Commitment in the Egyptian Banking Sector (2015, background): “Studies have shown that employee engagement has a positive influence on organisational performance indicators such as: employee satisfaction, productivity, employee turnover, organisational commitment, and safety [36,46,48,76].”
- Design Your Own Job Through Job Crafting (2014, background): “Work engagement, in turn, has a positive impact on job performance (Demerouti & Cropanzano, 2010).”
- Work orientations in the job demands-resources model (2012, background): “Deci, 1975; Hackman and Oldham, 1980), because employee motivation and engagement predict organizational performance (Demerouti and Cropanzano, 2010; Fried and Ferris, 1987).”
- Fostering task and adaptive performance through employee well-being: The role of servant leadership (2020, background): “Wherein work engagement is a positive affective-motivational state of mind characterized by vigor, dedication, and absorption at work (Schaufeli et al., 2002), burnout is characterized by exhaustion and negative attitudes toward work (Demerouti et al., 2010b).”
- Employee engagement, human resource management practices and competitive advantage (2015, result): “Consistent with the modelling in Figure 1, a number of meta-analyses and reviews have also demonstrated that engagement is positively associated with attitudinal, behavioural, and performance related outcomes (e.g. Christian et al., 2011; Demerouti and Cropanzano, 2010; Halbesleben, 2010; Mauno et a”
- Coworker support as a double-edged sword: a moderated mediation model of job crafting, work engagement, and job performance (2020, background): “This is grounded in the reasoning that engaged employees display positive emotions (Demerouti & Cropanzano, 2010), which expand their range of thoughts and actions and allow them to effectively integrate diverse ideas (Fredrickson, 2001).”
- Burnout and Work Engagement: The JD–R Approach (2014, unknown): “As noted by Demerouti & Cropanzano (2010), work engagement (and particularly vigor) enables the employee to move on from thought to action, so that engaged employees achieve better performance.”
- Work engagement versus workaholism : a test of the spillover-crossover model (2013, unknown): “Heavy work investment characterised by a strong focus on the task at hand and a high level of dedication to work generally has positive consequences for job performance (Beal et al., 2005; Demerouti and Cropanzano, 2010).”