Missing data techniques for structural equation modeling.
By P. Allison. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 2003
1,356 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6c22369598059d7c191db52006d697ef7d07c352
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management Science and Operations Research
In Statistics and Probability
Citations in the corpus
- Self-assessment in the process of self-regulated learning and its relationship with academic achievement (2020, methodology): “Hence, full information maximum likelihood estimation, which is generally favored in structural equation modeling (SEM) under the MCAR assumption (Allison 2003), was adopted to deal with missing data.”
- The Influence of Childhood (2012, methodology): “Data were incomplete and deemed missing at random (Allison, 2003; Schafer & Graham, 2002), showing mild departures from normality, with absolute univariate skewness and kurtosis values slightly different from zero (Enders, 2001). Consequently, an expectationmaximization (EM) covariance matrix was es”
- Employee engagement and job performance in Lebanon: the mediating role of creativity (2019, methodology): “05), listwise deletion of missing data was employed since it does not present bias into the data (Allison, 2003).”
- The Empathy Assessment Index (EAI): A Confirmatory Factor Analysis of a Multidimensional Model of Empathy (2011, methodology): “Following recent recommendations (Allison, 2003; Peugh & Enders, 2004) that listwise deletion method is prone to biased estimates, we used the expectation maximization algorithm (Schafer & Graham, 2002) to impute the missing values.”
- Motivation, Gender, and Possible Selves (2013, background): “This procedure yields unbiased estimates under relatively moderate assumptions, which in the current study are fully satisfied (Allison, 2003; Schafer & Graham, 2002).”
- The impact of visual factors on noise annoyance among people living in the vicinity of wind turbines (2008, methodology): “Missing values in the SEM were handled using the full information maximum likelihood (FIML) estimator (see, e.g., Allison, 2003).”
- A Brief Guide to Structural Equation Modeling (2006, methodology): “Allison’s (2003) review of techniques such as listwise deletion, pairwise deletion, maximum likelihood (ML), and multiple imputation is quite informative for readers interested in details beyond the scope of this review.”
- Work–life balance: a longitudinal evaluation of a new measure across Australia and New Zealand workers (2014, result): “…most noticeably the full information maximum likelihood (FIML), when conducting SEM has been noted to be preferable by some authors (e.g. Graham 2009; Schlomer, Bauman and Card 2010), although any differences in results when using FIML compared to EM are typically noted to be small (Allison 2003).”
- Understanding students’ motivation towards proactive career behaviours through goal-setting theory and the job demands–resources model (2018, methodology): “Missing data were dealt with using maximum likelihood estimation in line with methodology by Allison (2003).”
- Ethical and Passive Leadership and Their Joint Relationships with Burnout via Role Clarity and Role Overload (2018, methodology): “Studies have shown that this method generally outperforms other methods to deal with missing data (Allison 2003; Kline 2005).”
- Attrition in developmental psychology (2017, methodology): “Consequently, FIML, unlike pairwise deletion, uses the appropriate sample size for standard error estimates (Allison, 2003; Enders, 2001) and is less likely to produce a non-positive definite matrix (Wothke, 1993).”