The Validity Issue in Mixed Research

By Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie, R. Burke Johnson. 2006

1,048 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6bfec4b77e5befdd1282de319b08294ba7913aaf

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

A scoring system for appraising mixed methods research, and concomitantly appraising qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods primary studies in Mixed Studies Reviews. (2009, background): “The content validity of quality appraisal tools for mixed methods is still an issue (Onwuegbuzie and Johnson, 2006) which the present paper seeks to address.”
Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Methods for Organizational Diagnosis (2008, unknown): “As Onwuegbuzie and Johnson (2006) suggested, ‘‘When a sequential mixed design is used, it is possible that the metainference that arises is solely or largely the effect of the sequencing itself’’ (p. 58).”
Prevalence of Mixed-methods Sampling Designs in Social Science Research (2006, background): “As noted by Onwuegbuzie and Johnson (2006), unless the relationship between the qualitative and quantitative samples is identical, conducting meta-inferences by integrating inferences from the qualitative and quantitative phases can pose a threat to what they refer to as sample integration…”
A Continuation of the Paradigm Wars? Prevalence Rates of Methodological Approaches Across the Social/Behavioral Sciences (2010, background): “Mixed methodologists have begun discussing the various quality criteria that apply to MM research (e.g., Dellinger & Leech, 2007; Onwuegbuzie & Johnson, 2006; Tashakkori & Teddlie, 2008).”
Evaluating Mixed Research Studies: A Mixed Methods Approach (2010, methodology): “Legitimation is defined by Onwuegbuzie and Johnson as ‘‘making inferences that are credible, trustworthy, dependable, transferable, and/or confirmable’’ (p. 52). The design of this study was appropriate for the purpose of the study by using an instrument design model (Creswell, Fetters, & Ivankova, ”
Critical Appraisal of Mixed Methods Studies (2013, methodology): “at Katholieke Univ Leuven on May 5, 2013mmr.sagepub.comDownloaded from Dingsøyr, & Hanssen, 2007; Greene, 2007; O’Cathain, Murphy, & Nicholl, 2008; Onwuegbuzie & Johnson, 2006; Pluye, Gagnon, Griffiths, & Johnson-Lafleur, 2009a; Pluye, Grad, Dunikowski, & Stephenson, 2005; Sale & Brazil, 2004;…”
Guidelines for Conducting and Reporting Mixed Research in the Field of Counseling and beyond. (2010, background): “Onwuegbuzie and Johnson (2006) have recently outlined a new typology of legitimation types in mixed research that contains the following nine legitimation types: sample integration legitimation, insider–outsider legitimation, weakness minimization legitimation, sequential legitimation, conversion…”
A Typology of Mixed Methods Sampling Designs in Social Science Research (2007, unknown): “As noted by Onwuegbuzie and Johnson (2006), unless the relationship between the qualitative and quantitative samples is identical (cf. Figure 2), conducting meta-inferences by pulling together the inferences from the qualitative and quantitative phases can pose a threat to legitimation.”
Toward a Unified Validation Framework in Mixed Methods Research (2007, methodology): “Each of the two models described above (Onwuegbuzie & Johnson, 2006; Tashakkori & Teddlie, in press) provides meaningful criteria for assessing issues associated with mixed methods research and the inferences associated with that research.”
Guidelines for Conducting Mixed-methods Research: An Extension and Illustration (2016, methodology): “Weakness minimization “The extent to which the weakness from one approach is compensated by the strengths from the other approach” (Onwuegbuzie & Johnson, 2006, p. 57).”
A Mixed Research Investigation of Factors Related to Time to the Doctorate in Education (2011, background): “…of the quantitative sample, the assessment of inferences was less problematic; that is, the sample integration threat (i.e., the extent to which the relationship between the quantitative and qualitative sampling designs yields quality meta-inferences) was minimized (Onwuegbuzie & Johnson, 2006).”
A Mixed Methods Investigation of Mixed Methods Sampling Designs in Social and Health Science Research (2007, background): “The challenge of legitimation refers to the difficulty in obtaining findings and/or making inferences that are credible, trustworthy, dependable, transferable, and/or confirmable (Onwuegbuzie & Johnson, 2006).”