Toward a Unified Validation Framework in Mixed Methods Research

By A. Dellinger, Nancy L. Leech. 2007

346 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, General Health Professions, Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/53326add8e8ffd96bf458a2110daaa8361130e19

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

1. Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie
2. Nancy L. Leech
3. V. Venkatesh
4. Susan A. Brown
5. Yulia W. Sullivan
6. Valerie Anderson
7. Patrick Onghena
8. Mieke Heyvaert

In General Health Professions

1. Nancy L. Leech
2. Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie
3. V. Venkatesh
4. Susan A. Brown
5. Yulia W. Sullivan
6. Mieke Heyvaert
7. Patrick Onghena
8. B. Maes

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. Nancy L. Leech
2. Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie
3. Mieke Heyvaert
4. C. Teddlie
5. V. Venkatesh
6. Susan A. Brown
7. Patrick Onghena
8. B. Maes

Citations in the corpus

• Guidelines for Conducting and Reporting Mixed Research in the Field of Counseling and beyond. (2010, background): “Indeed, authors should provide a concise, logical, and coherent articulation of the validity of inferences presented in the individual studies that make up a review of literature as a means of providing legitimacy for the review of literature (Dellinger & Leech, 2005, 2007).”
• A Continuation of the Paradigm Wars? Prevalence Rates of Methodological Approaches Across the Social/Behavioral Sciences (2010, background): “Mixed methodologists have begun discussing the various quality criteria that apply to MM research (e.g., Dellinger & Leech, 2007; Onwuegbuzie & Johnson, 2006; Tashakkori & Teddlie, 2008).”
• Critical Appraisal of Mixed Methods Studies (2013, methodology): “Four CAFs do explicitly include criteria related to philosophical assumptions (Creswell & Plano Clark, 2007; Dellinger & Leech, 2007; Greene, 2007; Onwuegbuzie & Johnson, 2006).”
• Criteria for Evaluating Qualitative Research (2017, background): “Rigor is important but, from the perspective of some transformative paradigms, this understanding of rigor is problematically limited as it excludes consideration of the motivation and purpose of research and the social or community-related effects of research outcomes (Dellinger & Leech, 2007).”
• Guidelines for Conducting Mixed-methods Research: An Extension and Illustration (2016, background): “Inference quality Onwuegbuzie & Johnson (2006) (see also Dellinger & Leech, 2007) Sample integration “The extent to which the relationship between the quantitative and qualitative sampling designs yields quality meta-inferences” (Onwuegbuzie & Johnson, 2006, p. 57).”
• Evaluating Mixed Research Studies: A Mixed Methods Approach (2010, methodology): “As noted in Dellinger and Leech (2007), historical validity is related to the use, appropriate or inappropriate, of a study’s measures, results, or inferences.”