A Typology of Mixed Methods Sampling Designs in Social Science Research

By Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie, Kathleen M. T. Collins. 2007

668 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/781eddcf61f745b610231b74d089c707695f5149

Citations in the corpus

• Brand addiction in the contexts of luxury and fast-fashion brands (2020, unknown): “For example, prominent scholars in social science methodology recommend twelve informants for interviewtype of qualitative research (Guest, Bunce and Johnson, 2006; Onwuegbuzie and Collins, 2007).”
• Beyond Words: Using Nonverbal Communication Data in Research to Enhance Thick Description and Interpretation (2013, unknown): “The sampling design of our mixed methods research-based systematic review represented a sequential design using identical samples; that is, the same number of articles or cases informed both the quantitative and the qualitative phases of our research (Onwuegbuzie & Collins, 2007).”
• Sampling Designs in Qualitative Research: Making the Sampling Process More Public (2007, unknown): “Indeed, extending the work of Patton (1990) and Miles and Huberman (1994), Onwuegbuzie and Leech (2004b) identified 24 sampling schemes that are available to researchers including qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods researchers.”
• An Overview of Qualitative Research and Focus Group Discussion (2021, unknown): “…used in grounded theory research (Glaser& Strauss, 1967), then Leech and Onwuegbuzie (2007, 2008) had discovered that constant comparison may be helpful to analyze other types of data such as focus group discussion (Leech& Onwuegbuzie, 2008; Onwuegbuzie & Collins, 2007; Onwuegbuzie et al., 2009).”
• Guidelines for Conducting and Reporting Mixed Research in the Field of Counseling and beyond. (2010, unknown): “Sampling designs are much more complex in mixed research studies than in mono-method studies because the former involves at least one extra layer of sampling (Onwuegbuzie & Collins, 2007; Teddlie & Yu, 2007).”