Information privacy and correlates: an empirical attempt to bridge and distinguish privacy-related concepts

By Tamara Dinev, Heng Xu, Jeff Smith, Paul J. Hart. European Journal of Information Systems, 2013

505 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Blissfully ignorant: the effects of general privacy concerns, general institutional trust, and affect in the privacy calculus (2015, background): “Entitled the privacy calculus (Culnan & Armstrong, 1999), this privacy trade-off has been extensively researched in several contexts, such as e-commerce (Dinev & Hart, 2006), the Internet (Malhotra et al., 2004; Dinev et al., 2012) or mobile applications (Xu et al.”
Mobile health technology adoption across generations: Narrowing the digital divide (2018, background): “Risk beliefs refer to an individual's expectation that disclosing health information will result in a negative outcome (Dinev et al., 2012).”
Location information disclosure in location-based social network services: Privacy calculus, benefit structure, and gender differences (2015, background): “…variables Dependent variables Interaction effects Theory Perceived need for government surveillance Willingness to provide personal information Dinev et al. (2013) Web 2.0 Anonymity Secrecy Confidentiality Perceived benefits Information sensitivity Importance of information transparency…”