Motivational interviewing with offenders: A systematic review

By Mary McMurran. 2009

295 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Epidemiology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/849887c85cc6fafb54dea2ab747c646c6bc64530

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. J. Bonta
2. S. Wormith
3. Demetra Andrews
4. Devon L. L. Polaschek
5. F. Cullen
6. J. Wormith
7. Tony Ward
8. J. Levenson

In Epidemiology

1. Devon L. L. Polaschek

In Sociology and Political Science

1. J. Bonta
2. S. Wormith
3. Demetra Andrews
4. Devon L. L. Polaschek
5. Laurence Alison
6. J. Wormith
7. F. Cullen
8. Tony Ward

Citations in the corpus

• The Risk-Need-Responsivity (RNR) Model (2011, background): “We are very encouraged by the advancement of motivational interviewing (MI; Miller & Rollnick, 1991, 2002) over the past decade and its application to correctional clientele (Ginsburg, Mann, Rotgers, & Weekes, 2002; McMurran, 2009).”
• Why Tough Tactics Fail and Rapport Gets Results: Observing Rapport-Based Interpersonal Techniques (ORBIT) to Generate Useful Information From Terrorists (2013, background): “, 2010), parenting supportiveness programs (Corcoran, 2003), court-ordered substance misuse (Clark, 2001), and correctional treatment programs (McMurran, 2009).”
• An appraisal of the risk–need–responsivity (RNR) model of offender rehabilitation and its application in correctional treatment (2012, background): “For example, it is still unclear why demographic variables such as gender and ethnicity are important, and there remains limited detail about offender motivation and engagement in treatment, despite decade-long Level II developments in motivational interventions (McMurran, 2009) and more recently in”