The Risk-Need-Responsivity Model of Assessment and Human Service in Prevention and Corrections: Crime-Prevention Jurisprudence

By Demetra Andrews, C. Dowden. 2007

241 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/21df8c9bb9037013feabb4dda7b29b0ff829d087

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. J. Bonta
2. S. Wormith
3. Demetra Andrews
4. Kelly Hannah-Moffat
5. J. Wormith
6. J. Levenson
7. Momin M. Malik
8. Jan Looman

In Sociology and Political Science

1. J. Bonta
2. S. Wormith
3. Demetra Andrews
4. Kelly Hannah-Moffat
5. J. Wormith
6. J. Levenson
7. Momin M. Malik
8. Michael T. Baglivio

Citations in the corpus

• Rehabilitating criminal justice policy and practice. (2010, background): “Judges can divert low-risk offenders from prison settings and thus, minimize associations with higher-risk offenders (Andrews & Dowden, 2007).”
• The Risk-Need-Responsivity (RNR) Model (2011, methodology): “This is also true with programs offered in a non–restorative justice context (Andrews & Dowden, 2007).”
• Actuarial Sentencing: An “Unsettled” Proposition (2013, background): “…Canadian, British,2 and European jurisdictions are increasingly mandating or incorporating risk tools into sentencing policy for nonviolent offenders (Andrews & Dowden, 2008; Harcourt 2007; Hyatt et al., 2011; Kleiman et al., 2007; Ostrom et al., 2002; Raynor & Lewis, 2011; Warren, 2007).”