The Risk-Need-Responsivity (RNR) Model

By S. Wormith, Demetra Andrews, J. Bonta. 2011

727 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5226198888b502adfa8bcc5c3217d5bbdf0bdd4a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Joshua C. Cochran
2. D. Mears
3. F. Lösel
4. Martin Schmucker
5. William D. Bales
6. Alexander M. Holsinger
7. Christopher T. Lowenkamp
8. Eric A. Stewart

In Psychiatry and Mental health

1. F. Cullen
2. Jan Looman
3. J. Abracen

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Joshua C. Cochran
2. D. Mears
3. F. Lösel
4. William D. Bales
5. Martin Schmucker
6. Eric A. Stewart
7. Alexander M. Holsinger
8. Christopher T. Lowenkamp

Citations in the corpus

• The Risk Need Responsivity Model of Offender Rehabilitation: Is There Really a Need for a Paradigm Shift?. (2013, methodology): “The good lives model and the risk need responsivity model: A critical response to Andrews, Bon- ta, and Wormith (2011).”
• Domestic Violence Perpetrator Programs: A Proposal for Evidence-Based Standards in the United States (2016, background): “Rather, facilitators should be concerned with human service delivery rather than relying on the severity of the penalty (Andrews et al., 2011).”
• Does Inmate Behavior Affect Post-Release Offending? Investigating the Misconduct-Recidivism Relationship among Youth and Adults (2014, background): “Similarly, improvements in risk prediction have enabled corrections officials to improve classifications of released prisoners based on their likelihood of future offending (Gottfredson and Moriarty 2006; Andrews et al. 2011; Rhodes 2011).”
• A random study of Staff Training Aimed at Reducing Re-arrest (STARR): using core correctional practices in probation interactions (2012, background): “Emerging research (e.g. Bonta et al. 2008, Andrews et al. 2011) suggests that the interaction between the officer and offender may impact recidivism rates in ways not previously considered.”
• The effects of sexual offender treatment on recidivism: an international meta-analysis of sound quality evaluations (2015, background): “This goes against the concept of indiv dual needs and specific responsivity (Andrews et al., 2011), especially in mixed groups with very heterogenous offender types.”
• Rehabilitation: Beyond Nothing Works (2013, background): “It remains to be seen whether these approaches are sufficiently theoretically sound and effective to reduce recidivism and to outperform the RNR model (Andrews, Bonta, and Wormith 2011; Cullen 2012; see also Porporino 2010).”