Behavioral Causes of the Bullwhip Effect and the Observed Value of Inventory Information

By Rachel T. A. Croson, Karen Donohue. Management Sciences, 2006

586 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Information Systems, Management Science and Operations Research, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6a9d24721e16f3afcf9f36a4d2dc500cf8f5228c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Information Systems

In Management Science and Operations Research

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Information Transmission and the Bullwhip Effect: An Empirical Investigation (2012, unknown): “Finally, Sterman (1989) and Croson and Donohue (2003, 2006) study the bullwhip effect in the laboratory.”
Bounded Rationality in Newsvendor Models (2008, methodology): “Subsequently, the experiment in Croson and Donohue (2006) also controls for the fourth cause by using a publicly known (uniform) demand distribution. In both studies, the bullwhip effect is observed. Furthermore, both studies identified the failure to account adequately for the supply line as an imp”
An Empirical Study of the Bullwhip Effect in China (2014, background): “Other researchers focus on behavioral causes to provide experimental evidence of the bullwhip effect (see Croson and Donohue 2006, Sterman 1989, Wu and Katok 2006).”
Returns and the bullwhip effect (2013, methodology): “(2000a), Dejonckheere et al. (2004), and Chatfield et al.”
The Bullwhip Effect—Impact of Stochastic Lead Time, Information Quality, and Information Sharing: A Simulation Study (2004, background): “This behavioral approach is shared by Croson and Donohue (2003a,b), who utilize games with a known demand distribution and information sharing between participants.”
Learning, communication, and the bullwhip effect (2006, methodology): “First, as in Croson and Donohue (2003, 2004) , we control the customer demand distribution to be uniformly distributed from 0 to 8 units.”
Individual differences in the newsvendor problem: Behavior and cognitive reflection (2013, background): “Croson and Donohue (2006) called for theoretical research that incorporates individual biases.”
Socially and Environmentally Responsible Value Chain Innovations: New Operations Management Research Opportunities (2017, background): “…these new challenges can stimulate innovative OM research involving different research methods like field-based and behavioral experiments (Croson and Donohue 2006, Bloom et al. 2013, Parker et al. 2016), empirical analysis (Fisher 2007), data-driven research (Simchi-Levi 2014), and D ow…”
Trust in Forecast Information Sharing (2011, background): “One group focuses on identifying the behavioral causes of the bullwhip effect (e.g., Croson and Donohue 2006, Wu and Katok 2006).”
The Impact of Information Sharing on Supply Chain Performance under Asymmetric Information (2013, background): “2 There are numerous works on the bullwhip effect (see e.g., Croson and Donohue 2006, Sterman 1989, Wu and Katok 2006) investigating the interaction of supply chain parties in experimental settings.”
Toward a Theory of Behavioral Operations (2008, background): “…with a growing number of experimental studies within OM, the majority of 676 which has explored the behavioral underpinnings of the bullwhip effect (Croson and Donohue 2002, 2006; Sterman 1989a, b) or investigated issues at the interface between operations and human resource management (for a…”
The role of incentives and communication in strategic alliances: an experimental investigation (2009, background): “Indeed, Dyer, Kagel, and Levine (1989) and Croson and Donohue (2006) find that 'real world' decision makers performed the same or sometimes worse in the laboratory setting than students.”