Seeing the need for ISO 14001

By R. Jiang, Pratima Bansal. 2003

482 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6a7de5e8376b26ab08545ce6bf55f141a7303578

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Olivier Boiral
2. Timo Busch
3. J. Pinkse
4. F. Fortanier
5. Ans Kolk
6. Jean-François Henri
7. D. Talbot
8. K. Iatridis

Citations in the corpus

• GOOD FENCES MAKE GOOD NEIGHBOURS: A LONGITUDINAL ANALYSIS OF AN INDUSTRY SELF-REGULATORY INSTITUTION (2018, unknown): “…recent years that growing awareness of research in other fields and increasing recognition of the importance of protecting common resources has caused management scholars to take a more active interest in self-regulatory institutions (Furman & Stern, 2006; Jiang & Bansal, 2003; King & Lenox, 2000).”
• Sustainable Certification for Future Generations (2014, unknown): “…researchers with confidence in the adoption of substantive environmental practices, limits concerns of greenwashing (Delmas & Burbano, 2011), and functions as an effective signaling mechanism of the firm’s environmental performance (Delmas, 2002; Jiang & Bansal, 2003; King, Lenox, & Terlaak, 2005).”
• A Case Study of Stakeholder Identification and Prioritization by Managers (2007, methodology): “Open ended interviews were used as part of seven case studies (Driscoll and Crombie, 2001; Harvey and Schaefer, 2001; Howard et al., 2003; IJzerman et al., 2003; Jiang and Bansal, 2003; McDaniel and Miskel, 2002; Winn and Keller, 2001).”
• Organizational Responses to Environmental Demands: Opening the Black Box (2008, background): “Buyers motivate many companies to adopt environmental management practices and standards (Christmann and Taylor, 2001; Henriques and Sadorsky, 1996; Jiang and Bansal, 2003; King et al., 2005).”
• Harmonization in CSR Reporting (2011, background): “stakeholders (Jiang and Bansal 2003).”
• Eco-Labeling Strategies and Price-Premium (2014, unknown): “In addition to helping efficiency gains and improvement in the quality of manufacturing, certified management standards can also function as an effective signaling mechanism through the third-party certification process (Jiang & Bansal, 2003; King, Lenox, & Terlaak, 2005).”
• What Drives Substantive Versus Symbolic Implementation of ISO 14001 in a Time of Economic Crisis? Insights from Greek Manufacturing Companies (2018, background): “…and institutional and commercial pressures are important for the adoption of the ISO 14001 standard (Darnall and Edwards 2006; Delmas 2002; Jiang and Bansal 2003; de Oliveira et al. 2010; González et al. 2008; Prajogo et al. 2012; Nishitani et al. 2012; Singh et al. 2014, 2015), the…”
• The Robustness of the Corporate Social and Financial Performance Relation: A Second‐Order Meta‐Analysis (2018, background): “These are visibility to the public and consumers (Fry, Keim, & Meiners, 1982; Jiang & Bansal, 2003), research and development investments (McWilliams & Siegel, 2000), economic conditions (Golicic & Smith, 2013), the level of diversification, advertising, government sales, consumer income, and stage…”
• Deciding on ISO 14001: Economics, Institutions, and Context (2002, unknown): “It is not surprising, therefore, that countries with tight social relationships, such as in Japan, have higher levels of acceptance of ISO 14001 when compared to very individualistic countries such as the US and Canada.”
• Managers’ Citizenship Behaviors for the Environment: A Developmental Perspective (2018, background): “Where this involvement is insufficient, those systems are tend to be disconnected from daily activities and to be implemented symbolically rather than substantially (Boiral 2007; Jiang and Bansal 2003; Yin and Schmeidler 2009).”