Developmental dyslexia: the cerebellar deficit hypothesis.
By R. Nicolson, A. Fawcett, Paul Dean. Trends in Neurosciences, 2001
775 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6a1b5cdd78af6c284f34cce62317c9a4b65224eb
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Usha Goswami
- R. Dum
- Julie A. Fiez
- F. X. Castellanos
- Jennifer M Thomson
- B. Fryer
- J. Maltby
- Rosemary Tannock
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Usha Goswami
- Jennifer M Thomson
- B. Fryer
- F. X. Castellanos
- J. Maltby
- Rosemary Tannock
- Johannes C. Ziegler
- Elinor Saiegh-Haddad
Citations in the corpus
- Auditory and motor rhythm awareness in adults with dyslexia (2006, background): “The most researched and also most controversial framework within which motor deficits have been linked to dyslexia is the automaticity/cerebellar hypothesis of Nicolson and Fawcett (Nicolson & Fawcett, 1990; Nicolson, Fawcett & Dean, 2001 ).”
- Neuroscience of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: the search for endophenotypes (2002, background): “gov/htbin-post/Omim/getmim?search=dyslexia&field=title">developmental dyslexia , or the time-estimation deficits in both ADHD and developmental dyslexi”
- Cerebellum and nonmotor function. (2009, background): “A developmental perspective may also help to explain the associations that have been made between neuroanatomical and neurophysiological abnormalities in the cerebellum and disorders such as autism (Amaral et al. 2008), schizophrenia (Andreasen & Pierson 2008), and dyslexia (Nicolson et al. 2001).”