How We Conceptualize Our Attitudes Matters: The Effects of Valence Framing on the Resistance of Political Attitudes

By George Y. Bizer, Richard E. Petty. 2005

128 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/69b407ca2986662b5f976894bf94a3ad3aa5ba51

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Consumer conviction and commitment: An appraisal-based framework for attitude certainty (2014, background): “Opposition framing also causes attitudes to become more resistant to change (Bizer & Petty, 2005).”
Making it moral: Merely labeling an attitude as moral increases its strength (2016, background): “At the very least, both lay (Lakoff, 2004) and academic (Bizer & Petty, 2005) interest in issue-and attitude-framing are becoming more widespread, thus placing the current ﬁ ndings in the vanguard of a potentially burgeoning applied research domain.”
Dealing with feelings: Positive and negative discrete emotions as mediators of news framing effects (2012, background): “The importance of studying valence frames can be connected to the capacity of such frames to affect opinion and support for an issue (de Vreese and Boomgaarden, 2003), with neutral frames being more relevant only for issue interpretations (see also Bizer and Petty, 2005).”
Getting real: the duration of framing effects (2011, background): “…the capacity to affect opinion on and support for an issue, while neutral emphasis frames are more likely to affect issue interpretation (see also Bizer & Petty, 2005).1 Given the conjectural ‘‘existence’’ of framing effects, one of the main goals of current studies is to describe the…”
The Meta–Cognitive Model (MCM) of Attitudes: Implications for Attitude Measurement, Change, and Strength (2007, methodology): “When the negated evaluation is a prior attitude, we have referred to our approach as the PAST (Prior Attitudes are Still There) Model (Petty & Jarvis, 1998; Petty et al., That is, the PAST Model is a specialized case of the more general MCM. ).”
Exploring the Valence‐Framing Effect: Negative Framing Enhances Attitude Strength (2011, background): “In an initial exploration of the valence framing effect, Bizer and Petty (2005) examined whether negatively framed attitudes toward fictitious political candi64 Bizer et al.”