Knowledge Revision Processes in Refutation Texts

194 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Handbook of Epistemic Cognition (2016, unknown): “Educational Psychologist, 46(3), 141–167. Collins, A. M. & Quillian, M. R. (1969). Retrieval time from semantic memory.”
Examining the Impact of Inference Instruction on the Literal and Inferential Comprehension of Skilled and Less Skilled Readers: A Meta-Analytic Review (2017, background): “Knowledge proponents, however, counter that the inability to suppress information is not because of faulty suppression, but is instead because of poor comprehenders’ lack of high quality knowledge networks that facilitate efficient retrieval of information (Kendeou et al., 2014; McNamara & McDaniel,”
The Role of Executive Functions in Reading Comprehension (2017, background): “Thefindingsshowedthat inhibition(measured by theStroop task)didnotplaya rolewhen reading refutation texts, perhapsbecause refutation texts providedacausalexplanationthathasbeenshowntoeffectivelyreduceand/oreliminateinterference due to misconceptions (Kendeou et al. 2013; Kendeou et al. 2014).”
Identity and Epistemic Emotions During Knowledge Revision: A Potential Account for the Backfire Effect (2016, background): “We should note that there is extensive prior research that demonstrate the effectiveness of refutation texts to promote adaptive learning overall (Heddy et al., 2014; Kendeou et al., 2013, 2014; Tippett, 2010).”