The Cambridge Handbook of Personality Psychology: Personality psychology of situations

By S. A. Wagerman, D. Funder. 2009

97 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6972852db4eecc22360996bccd966ba154e60eb6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. J. Rauthmann
2. R. Sherman
3. D. Funder
4. C. Wrzus
5. Matthias R. Mehl
6. Reeshad S. Dalal
7. M. Back
8. C. Nave

In Clinical Psychology

1. J. Rauthmann
2. R. Sherman
3. D. Funder
4. Reeshad S. Dalal
5. Matthias R. Mehl
6. C. Wrzus
7. Rustin D. Meyer
8. Jennifer P. Green

Citations in the corpus

• Principles of Situation Research: Towards a Better Understanding of Psychological Situations (2015, methodology): “…1981b; Rauthmann, 2012; Rauthmann et al., 2014; Reis, 2008; Ross & Nisbett, 1991; Rozin, 2001; Saucier, Bel-Bahar, & Fernandez, 2007; Sherman, Nave, & Funder, 2010, 2012, 2013; Swann & Seyle, 2005; ten Berge & de Raad, 1999, 2001, 2002; Wagerman & Funder, 2009; Yang, Read, & Miller, 2006, 2009).”
• Lab And/Or Field? Measuring Personality Processes and Their Social Consequences (2015, background): “…subjective, psychological features of situations are more important than physical features and have developed and validated instruments to assess the psychological features of situations (e.g. DIAMOND, Rauthmann et al., 2014; RSQ, Sherman et al., 2013; Wagerman & Funder, 2009; Morse et al., 2015).”
• Personality Strength and Situational Influences on Behavior (2015, background): “Nonetheless, as Wagerman and Funder (2009) noted, researchers can study personality, situations, and behavior successfully only if these constructs are conceptualized and measured independently— the alternative leads ultimately to theoretical paralysis.”
• Taking Situations Seriously (2016, background): “Thus, situations must be conceptualized separately from individual construals (Reis, 2008; Sherman, Nave, & Funder, 2010; Wagerman & Funder, 2009).”
• Measurement Matters: Assessing Personal Qualities Other Than Cognitive Ability for Educational Purposes (2015, unknown): “But they are not (Fleeson & Noftle, 2008; Mischel, 1968; Ross, Lepper, & Ward, 2010; Ross & Nisbett, 1991; Wagerman & Funder, 2009).”
• Honor Bound (2012, unknown): “We designed the questions to evoke examples of situations that are culturally consensual (see Wagerman & Funder, 2009).”