The Human Nature of Corporate Boards: Law, Norms and the Unintended Consequences of Independence and Accountability

By D. Langevoort. 2000

116 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Information Systems and Management, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/68dd85ab2987219be583af4741e0967964152ef9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Emmanuel Adegbite
2. Albert A. Cannella
3. S. Teerikangas
4. Jerayr Haleblian

In Information Systems and Management

1. Emmanuel Adegbite

In Social Psychology

1. Emmanuel Adegbite

Citations in the corpus

• Corporate Governance and Social Responsibility: A Comparative Analysis of the UK and the Us (2006, unknown): “Empirical studies are mixed on the accountability effects of board independence (Romano, 2005), with some scholars suggesting that the CEO will have more power when a majority of board members are independent (non-executives), since the CEO will then have a monopoly over information and greater cont”
• Corporate Board Attributes, Team Effectiveness and Financial Performance (2009, unknown): “Further, there are concerns that exposure to internal practices could increase the risk of shareholder lawsuits should troubles emerge (Langevoort, 2001).”
• Good corporate governance in Nigeria: Antecedents, propositions and peculiarities (2015, background): “1 Board independence Board independence connotes a willingness to bring a high degree of rigour, scrutiny and objectivity to the evaluation of a company’s management (Langevoort, 2001).”
• Corporate Governance: Decades of Dialogue and Data (2003, background): “Recent efforts at governance reform have included "increasing the liability exposure for directors who fall down on the job and fail to prevent some form of misbehavior by insiders" (Langevoort, 2001: 800).”