Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century - A review
By Judit Bar-Ilan. J. Informetrics, 2008
459 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Information Systems, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b2267c768ae7726ca1361f8f23e11f3836f3b959
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Information Systems
- Chaomei Chen
- José M. Merigó
- Ludo Waltman
- Jianbo Yang
- Loet Leydesdorff
- John C. Mingers
- Jia-lin Hou
- Johan A. Wallin
In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
- Chaomei Chen
- Loet Leydesdorff
- José M. Merigó
- Ludo Waltman
- Johan A. Wallin
- John C. Mingers
- Michael Gusenbauer
- Jianbo Yang
In Statistics and Probability
- Chaomei Chen
- Ludo Waltman
- José M. Merigó
- Jia-lin Hou
- Xiucai Yang
- Loet Leydesdorff
- Jianbo Yang
- Ole Ellegaard
Citations in the corpus
- Emerging trends and new developments in information science: a document co-citation analysis (2009–2016) (2018, background): “For instance, some research selected 16 journals (Milojevic´ et al. 2011; Nisonger and Davis 2005), 5 journals (Janssens et al. 2006, 2008), a single issue of JASISIT (Persson 1994; Jeong et al. 2014), or 580 highly cited papers (Chang et al. 2015).”
- Science Mapping: A Systematic Review of the Literature (2017, background): “…s tru ct ur e of in fo rm at io n re tri ev al (R or is sa & Y ua n, 2 01 2) 33 Journal of Data and Information Science http://www.jdis.org https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/jdis The next example depicts the novel co-citation links made by a review paper of informetrics (Bar-Ilan, 2008) (Figure 29).”
- The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? (2015, background): “Bibliometrics is closely related to the broader term ‘‘infometrics’’ (Egghe and Rousseau 1990; Wolfram 2003) and the narrower term ‘‘scientometrics’’ (Bar-Ilan 2008, 2010).”
- A review of theory and practice in scientometrics (2015, methodology): “Perhaps the most general field covering all types of information regardless of form or origin (Bar-Ilan, 2008; Egghe & Rousseau, 1990; Egghe & Rousseau, 1988; Wilson, 1999).”
- A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2015, methodology): “The analysis of Bar-Ilan (2008b) suggests that Google Scholar has a broader coverage than WoS and Scopus in computer science and mathematics, but a worse coverage in high energy physics.”
- Accounting Research: A Bibliometric Analysis (2017, background): “More recently, Bar-Ilan (2008) provided a complete overview of the concept from the general perspective of informetrics.”
- Entrepreneurship Assessment in Higher Education: A Research Review for Engineering Education Researchers (2018, background): “…Morton, & Libarkin2 0 , rt , i r i highly interdisciplinary nature of the field (Kushkowski, 2012), the existence of multiple electronic databases (Bar-Ilan, 2008; Hood & Wilson, 2003), and the range of research quality accepted for publication (Menold et al., 2015; Purzer et al., 2016).”
- The science of science: from the perspective of complex systems (2017, unknown): “A survey about applying social network analysis in scientist evaluation can be found in a previously published review article [203].”
- Google Scholar to overshadow them all? Comparing the sizes of 12 academic search engines and bibliographic databases (2018, background): “2015; Orduña-Malea and Delgado López-Cózar 2014; Hood and Wilson 2001; Thelwall 2008, 2009; Bar-Ilan 2008).”