Consumer attitudes to genetically modified organisms in food in the UK

By M. Burton, Danny Rigby, T. Young, Sallie James. 2001

335 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/671dcb81e2ff9fd756c9c79c61ac68426640dd92

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Plant Science

Citations in the corpus

Consumer Acceptance of Genetically Modified Food Products in the Developing World (2004, background): “Burton et al. (2001) in a study of consumer attitudes toward genetically modified foods in the United Kingdom, concluded that male shoppers were willing to pay an extra 26% to avoid animal and plant genetically modified technology, while female shoppers were willing to pay an extra 49.”
Consumer Preferences for Animal Welfare Attributes: The Case of Gestation Crates (2009, background): “Prior Research Several studies have investigated what consumers are willing to pay to avoid or obtain various food attributes (McCluskey et al., 2003; Grannis and Thilmany, 2002; Roosen, Lusk, and Fox, 2003; Burton et al., 2001; Lusk, Roosen, and Fox, 2003; Roosen, 2003; Alfnes, 2004; Tonsor et al.,”
Do fair trade and eco-labels in coffee wake up the consumer conscience? (2005, background): “identifiable even after consumption) is becoming increasingly important in the literature (see for example Bennet, 1997; Burton et al., 2001; Larson, 2003; Johnston et al., 2001).”
A choice experiment model for beef: What US consumer responses tell us about relative preferences for food safety, country-of-origin labeling and traceability (2007, methodology): “Each of the estimates was calculated using the ratio of the coefficient associated with the attribute of interest over the Price coefficient (see Burton et al. (2001), James and Burton (2003) and Layton and Brown (2000) for different applications).”
CONSUMER PREFERENCES AND WILLINGNESS TO PAY FOR FOOD LABELING: A DISCUSSION OF EMPIRICAL STUDIES (2003, background): “Burton et al. (2001), in a study of consumer attitudes toward genetically modified foods in the United Kingdom, concluded that male shoppers were willing to pay an extra 26 percent to avoid genetically modified animals and plants, while female shoppers were willing to pay an extra 49.3 percent.”
The mindful consumer: Balancing egoistic and altruistic motivations to purchase local food (2018, background): “…behaviour generally (e.g., Furst et al., 1996; Keane and Williets, 1994; Shepherd, 1990), as well as in relation to specific food types e.g. green foods (Je Schuitema and De Groot, 2015), organic produce (e.g., Nasir and Karakaya, 2014) and genetically modified food (e.g., Burton et al., 2001).”