A REVIEW OF EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE ON SCAFFOLDING FOR SCIENCE EDUCATION

By Tzu-Chiang Lin, Y. Hsu, Shu-Sheng Lin, Maio-Li Changlai, Kun-Yuan Yang, Ting-ling Lai. 2012

129 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/669fece2b52da1d238f9453567d64a975735383e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. K. R. Mahan
2. Mason R. Lefler
3. Brian R. Belland
4. Andrew E. Walker
5. Nam Ju Kim

In Education

1. K. R. Mahan
2. Mason R. Lefler
3. Brian R. Belland
4. Andrew E. Walker
5. Nam Ju Kim

Citations in the corpus

• Synthesizing Results From Empirical Research on Computer-Based Scaffolding in STEM Education (2016, result): “Only 16.5% of the 333 outcomes in this study included fading, confirming the dearth of this strategy in scaffolding studies (T.-C. Lin et al., 2012).”
• The comprehending teacher: scaffolding in content and language integrated learning (CLIL) (2020, background): “The majority of SLL scaffolding research is qualitative and descriptive and takes place in naturally occurring teaching (Lin et al. 2012).”