Crossmodal correspondences: A tutorial review

By Charles Spence. 2011

1,519 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sensory Systems

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Sensory Systems

Citations in the corpus

Assessing the Role of the ‘Unity Assumption’ on Multisensory Integration: A Review (2017, background): “The effects of crossmodal correspondences and semantic congruency often occur between stimuli in a larger temporal disparity over hundreds of ms that are represented as two distinct events, such as the studies demonstrating crossmodal semantic priming (Chen and Spence, 2011b, 2013).”
Assessing the influence of the multisensory environment on the whisky drinking experience (2013, background): “Importantly, these sounds were presented from a loudspeaker situated in the roof to ensure the congruency between the pitch of the sound and its elevation in space (see Spence’s review [31] of the literature on crossmodal correspondences between, for example, pitch and elevation).”
When “Bouba” equals “Kiki”: Cultural commonalities and cultural differences in sound-shape correspondences (2016, neutral): “k ( ) ( 1) sin ((2 1) ) (2 1) (sin ( ) 1 9 sin (3 ) 1 25 sin (5 ) ) (2) triangle”
Does crossmodal correspondence modulate the facilitatory effect of auditory cues on visual search? (2012, methodology): “Recently, Spence (2011) reviewed the evidence pointing to the need to consider crossmodal correspondences as a possible additional constraint on crossmodal binding.”
Store Atmospherics: A Multisensory Perspective (2014, background): “Recent research in cognitive neuro-science presents compelling evidence for universal cross-modality among cues presented in different sensory modalities (Spence, 2011a, 2012a), such that, for instance, people will tend to match certain tactile stimuli with particular colors (Ludwig & Simner, 2013).”
Does the weight of the dish influence our perception of food (2011, neutral): “These connections are commonly referred to as crossmodal correspondences (Schifferstein & Spence, 2008; Spence, 2011).”
Intersensory binding across space and time: A tutorial review (2013, background): “…with size/brightness in the visual dimension (Evans & Treisman, 2010; Gallace & Spence, 2006; GuzmanMartinez, Ortega, Grabowecky, Mossbridge & Suzuki, 2012; Makovac & Gerbino, 2010; Parise & Spence, 2008, 2009, 2012; Spence, 2011; Sweeny, Guzman-Martinez, Ortega, Grabowecky & Suzuki, 2012).”
A large sample study on the influence of the multisensory environment on the wine drinking experience (2014, background): “Such cross-modal correspondences between basic tastes and flavours on the one hand, and colours, sounds, shapes and so on on the other have become a rapidly growing area of interest for many researchers and marketers [19,48-50].”
Managing sensory expectations concerning products and brands: Capitalizing on the potential of sound and shape symbolism (2012, background): “Fortunately, however, statistical techniques now exist with which to determine the significance of such patterns of crossmodal correspondence (see Spence, 2011c), both in the psychology or linguistics laboratory, and, more importantly, out there in the marketplace.”