A large sample study on the influence of the multisensory environment on the wine drinking experience

By Charles Spence, Carlos Velasco, Klemens Knoeferle. Flavour, 2014

148 citations recorded by the source corpus.

BackgroundWe report on what may well be the world’s largest multisensory tasting experiment. Over a period of 4 days in May 2014, almost 3,000 people sampled a glass of red wine in a room in which the colour of the lighting and/or the music was changed repeatedly. The participants rated the wine, presented in a black tasting glass, on taste, intensity and liking scales while standing in each of four different environments over a period of 7 to 8 minutes. During the first 2 days (Experiment 1), the participants rated the wine while exposed to white lighting, red lighting, green lighting with music designed to enhance sourness and finally under red lighting paired with music associated with sweetness. During the latter 2 days of the event (Experiment 2), the same wine was rated under white lighting, green lighting, red lighting with sweet music and finally green lighting with sour music.ResultsIn Experiment 1, the wine was perceived as fresher and less intense under green lighting and sour music, as compared to any of the other three environments. On average, the participants liked the wine most under red lighting while listening to sweet music. A similar pattern of results was reported in Experiment 2.ConclusionsThese results demonstrate that the environment can exert a significant influence on the perception of wine (at least in a random sample of social drinkers). We outline a number of possible explanations for how the sensory properties of the environment might influence the perception of wine. Finally, we consider some of the implications of these results for the wine drinking experience.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sensory Systems, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/eb93e270cdb418a69b9b57023dba21fd99016bdb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

  1. Felipe Reinoso Carvalho
  2. Qian Janice Wang
  3. Raymond van Ee
  4. Charles Spence
  5. Yi-Chuan Chen
  6. Mirjam Keetels
  7. Jean H. M. Vroomen
  8. Camille Koppen

In Sensory Systems

  1. Felipe Reinoso Carvalho
  2. Qian Janice Wang
  3. Raymond van Ee
  4. Charles Spence
  5. Yi-Chuan Chen
  6. Mirjam Keetels
  7. Carlos Velasco
  8. Andy Woods

In Social Psychology

  1. Charles Spence
  2. Camille Koppen
  3. Yi-Chuan Chen
  4. Jean H. M. Vroomen
  5. Mirjam Keetels
  6. Agnès Alsius
  7. Argiro Vatakis
  8. Carlos Velasco

Citations in the corpus