Intersensory binding across space and time: A tutorial review
By Lihan Chen, Jean H. M. Vroomen. 2013
220 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sensory Systems
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Yi-Chuan Chen
- Charles Spence
- Brian Odegaard
- David R. Wozny
- Ladan Shams
- Uta Noppeney
- Jean H. M. Vroomen
- Mirjam Keetels
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Yi-Chuan Chen
- Charles Spence
- Brian Odegaard
- David R. Wozny
- Ladan Shams
- Jean H. M. Vroomen
- Uta Noppeney
- Mirjam Keetels
In Sensory Systems
- Yi-Chuan Chen
- Charles Spence
- Brian Odegaard
- David R. Wozny
- Ladan Shams
- Mirjam Keetels
- Carlos Velasco
- Christoph Kayser
Citations in the corpus
- Assessing the Role of the ‘Unity Assumption’ on Multisensory Integration: A Review (2017, background): “…crossmodal correspondences, semantic congruency INTRODUCTION The ‘unity assumption’ is an observer’s assumption, or belief, that two or more unisensory cues belong together (i.e., that they come from the same object or event1, Welch and Warren, 1980, 1986; Spence, 2007; Chen and Vroomen, 2013).”
- Biases in Visual, Auditory, and Audiovisual Perception of Space (2015, background): “While many studies have focused on how far this “spatial window” of audiovisual integration extends [29], one important question remains: when visual and auditory stimuli co-occur at the same spatial location (which is generally the case when an event produces both visual and auditory stimulation), ”