Assessing the influence of the multisensory environment on the whisky drinking experience

By Carlos Velasco, Russ Jones, Scott King, Charles Spence. Flavour, 2013

86 citations recorded by the source corpus.

BackgroundFlavor perception depends not only on the multisensory integration of the sensory inputs associated with the food or drink itself, but also on the multisensory attributes (or atmosphere) of the environment in which the food/drink is tasted. We report two experiments designed to investigate whether multisensory atmospheric cues could be used to influence the perception of a glass of whisky (that is, a complex but familiar product). The pre-test (experiment 1) was conducted in the laboratory and involved a sample of 18 participants (12 females, 5 males, and 1 who did not specify gender), while the main study (experiment 2) was conducted at a large purpose-designed whisky-tasting event held in London, and enrolled a sample of 441 participants (165 female, 250 male, and 26 who failed to specify their gender). In the main experiment, participants were exposed to three different multisensory atmospheres/rooms, and rated various attributes of the whisky (specifically the nose, the taste/flavor, and the aftertaste) in each room.ResultsAnalysis of the data showed that each multisensory atmosphere/room exerted a significant effect on participants’ ratings of the attributes that the atmosphere/room had been designed to emphasize (namely grassiness, sweetness, and woodiness). Specifically, the whisky was rated as being significantly grassier in the Nose (‘grassy’) room, as being significantly sweeter in the Taste (‘sweet’) room, and as having a significantly woodier aftertaste in the Finish (‘woody’) room. Overall, the participants preferred the whisky when they tasted it in the Finish room.ConclusionsTaken together, these results further our understanding of the significant influence that a multisensory atmosphere can have on people’s experience and/or enjoyment of a drink (in this case, a glass of whisky). The implications of these results for the future design of multisensory experiences are discussed.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sensory Systems, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8ecb0f9bcafc52e84b96b9aae283c4a8aacb3b5f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

  1. Carlos Velasco
  2. Charles Spence
  3. Klemens Knoeferle
  4. Anne L. Roggeveen
  5. Dhruv Grewal
  6. Nancy M. Puccinelli
  7. Yi-Chuan Chen
  8. Mirjam Keetels

In Sensory Systems

  1. Carlos Velasco
  2. Charles Spence
  3. Klemens Knoeferle
  4. Dhruv Grewal
  5. Nancy M. Puccinelli
  6. Anne L. Roggeveen
  7. Yi-Chuan Chen
  8. Mirjam Keetels

In Social Psychology

  1. Charles Spence
  2. Carlos Velasco
  3. Klemens Knoeferle
  4. Anne L. Roggeveen
  5. Dhruv Grewal
  6. Nancy M. Puccinelli
  7. Camille Koppen
  8. Yi-Chuan Chen

Citations in the corpus