Measuring student knowledge and skills : the PISA 2000 assessment of reading, mathematical and scientific literacy

By Andreas Schieicher, C. Tamassia, G. Masters, R. Adams. 2000

227 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Learning‐goals‐driven design model: Developing curriculum materials that align with national standards and incorporate project‐based pedagogy (2008, background): “Standards and curriculum frameworks have been established to ensure sufficient attention to science at particular grade levels (NRC, 1996; Tomorrow 98, 1992), and to establish a vision for what kind of science should be taught (Millar & Osborne, 1998; OECD, 2000; Tomorrow 98, 1992).”
Regional Disparities and Inequality of Opportunity: The Case of Italy (2005, unknown): “(OECD-PISA 2000, p.13).”
Enhancing Mathematical Reasoning in the Classroom: The Effects of Cooperative Learning and Metacognitive Training (2003, result): “These findings are in line with the New Standards (NCTM, 2000), as well as with current studies showing that fluency and flexibility are essential components of mathematical thinking (Nohda, 2000; Brenner, Herman, Ho, & Zimmer, 1999; Dreyfus & Eisenberg, 1996).”