Scoring or boring? Predicting boredom through repeated in-home consumption

By E. Zandstra, M. Weegels, A. A. V. Spronsen, M. Klerk. 2004

96 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Food Science, Marketing, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/664a12aab7733f30453efccbdeede6aafc78c3fe

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Food Science

1. J. Elzerman
2. F. Kok
3. Pieternel A. Luning
4. C. de Graaf
5. A. Hoek

In Social Psychology

1. J. Elzerman
2. Pieternel A. Luning
3. C. de Graaf
4. A. Hoek

Citations in the corpus

• Are meat substitutes liked better over time? A repeated in-home use test with meat substitutes or meat in meals (2013, methodology): “The repeated exposure thus consisted of 20 exposures, which has shown to be sufficient in other studies to demonstrate boredom effects and increase validity compared to a single taste test (see Zandstra et al., 2004).”