Cognition and international entrepreneurship: implications for research on international opportunity recognition and exploitation
By Shaker A. Zahra, Juha Santeri Korri, Jifeng Yu. 2005
643 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/65cef223713aa9c2d9b30219f2eaaae660c4e220
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management of Technology and Innovation
- Nicole Coviello
- Arto Ojala
- N. Evers
- I. Peiris
- Paresha N. Sinha
- M. Akoorie
- Holger Patzelt
- Yee Kwan Tang
In Strategy and Management
- Arto Ojala
- Nicole Coviello
- Tanja Kontinen
- Yee Kwan Tang
- N. Evers
- Svante Andersson
- I. Peiris
- Paresha N. Sinha
Citations in the corpus
- Entrepreneurial decision-making in internationalization: Propositions from mid-size firms (2008, background): “There is therefore a danger of imposing interpretations on entrepreneurs’ behaviours and drawing false conclusions (Zahra et al., 2005).”
- International opportunity recognition in international new ventures—a dynamic managerial capabilities perspective (2015, background): “Similarly, as opportunities exist both in domestic and in international markets (Zahra et al. 2005), scholars in the field of international entrepreneurship have called for more research on how international opportunities are identified and exploited (Dimitratos and Jones 2005; Ellis 2000; Zahra et…”
- International Opportunity Recognition among Small and Medium‐Sized Family Firms* (2011, neutral): “In the international context, opportunities are recognized in foreign markets and exploited by using resources from diverse national locations (Dimitratos and Jones 2005; Ellis 2008; Oviatt and McDougall 2005; Zahra et al. 2005).”
- Effectuation and foreign market entry of entrepreneurial firms (2015, background): “internationalization have mainly focused on the contents of new venture internationalization strategies, the development and implementation processes of internationalization have gained scant attention (Zahra and George, 2002; Zahra et al., 2005).”
- The inception of internationalization of small and medium enterprises: The role of activeness and networks (2014, background): “…market for the first time is the foundation of the series of events studied in international business, as it entails not only penetrating a yet unknown market, but also engaging in internationalization — a process yet unknown to the firm (Chandra et al., 2009; Schumpeter, 1934; Zahra et al., 2005).”
- Informal institutions and international entrepreneurship (2017, background): “It is suggested that the firm is an extension of the entrepreneur’s ego and it is also a means of gaining social acceptance and legitimacy in international markets (Zahra et al., 2005).”
- The Concept of International Opportunity in International Entrepreneurship: A Review and a Research Agenda (2014, positive): “The interest lies, in particular, in the changing perceptions and cognitive models of sense-making rather than static orientations (Ozgen and Baron 2007; Zahra et al. 2005).”
- Bounded entrepreneurship and internationalisation of indigenous Chinese private-owned firms (2008, background): “This is consistent with the sociological view that entrepreneurs are embedded in a social context and the interaction between entrepreneurs and their environment plays a major role in shaping their cognitive process, and, consequently, behaviour (Zahra et al, 2005).”
- Home Country Institutions and the Internationalization-Performance Relationship (2016, background): “Modeling the role of managerial cognition could shed light on how managers “perceive and construct their industries’ boundaries and opportunities at home and in host countries” (Zahra et al., 2005: 130).”
- Recognizing Opportunities for Sustainable Development (2011, background): “These moderating relationships suggest that findings from prior studies that focused on the direct effects of knowledge on opportunity recognition (e.g., Shane; Zahra et al., 2005) may provide an incomplete picture when applied to the recognition of sustainable development opportunities.”