Do writing and speaking employ the same syntactic representations
By Alexandra A. Cleland, Martin J. Pickering. 2006
142 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6598d052b9936197050dac0b5e904ae9f603aa87
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Victor S. Ferreira
- Martin J. Pickering
- Kyle Mahowald
- Richard Futrell
- Edward Gibson
- Ariel N. James
- Franklin Chang
- Julian M. Pine
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Victor S. Ferreira
- Martin J. Pickering
- Edward Gibson
- Richard Futrell
- Kyle Mahowald
- Ariel N. James
- Michelle S. Peter
- Franklin Chang
Citations in the corpus
- When and how do children develop knowledge of verb argument structure? Evidence from verb bias effects in a structural priming task (2015, background): “Thus, the phenomenon of structural priming is widely interpreted as evidence that adults have abstract representations of syntax that are stored independently of lexical items (e.g., Bock, 1989; Cleland & Pickering, 2006; Noppeney & Price, 2004).”
- A meta-analysis of syntactic priming in language production (2016, result): “…priming since only a small number of papers in our sample studied it, we take this to be broadly consistent with findings in the literature (Cleland & Pickering, 2006; Hartsuiker & Westenberg, 2000) that the modality of the prime does not strongly affect the size of the syntactic priming…”
- Structural priming: a critical review. (2008, background): “Within-language priming was enhanced when the verb was repeated between prime and target (as in Branigan, Pickering, & Cleland, 2000; Cleland & Pickering, 2006; Pickering & Branigan, 1998) in L1 and L2.”