The Effects of Behavioral/Cognitive-Behavioral Programs on Recidivism

By F. Pearson, D. Lipton, C. Cleland, D. Yee. 2002

321 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6506dce10d5e548fd41b436a2bde96e27d8869cd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Effects of Cognitive Behavioral Programs for Criminal Offenders (2007, background): “…confirmed the findings of positive CBT effects on the recidivism of offenders that have been reported in other recent meta-analyses (Landenberger & Lipsey, 2005; Lipsey, Chapman, & Landenberger, 2001; Lipsey & Landenberger, 2006; Pearson et al., 2002; Wilson, Bouffard, & MacKenzie, 2005).”
Human-Animal Interaction in a Prison Setting: Impact on Criminal Behavior, Treatment Progress, and Social Skills (2007, background): “Such an impact would likely be welcomed in the criminal justice system, as social-skill development is an integral part of many correctional rehabilitation programs (Pearson et al., 2002).”
DOES CORRECTIONAL PROGRAM QUALITY REALLY MATTER? THE IMPACT OF ADHERING TO THE PRINCIPLES OF EFFECTIVE INTERVENTION* (2006, unknown): “This research, however, often indicated considerable heterogeneity in the effectiveness of correctional programs that were based on cognitive-behavioral or behavioral therapies (for instance, see Lipsey et al., 2001; Pearson et al., 2002; Wilson et al., 2000).”
The positive effects of cognitive–behavioral programs for offenders: A meta-analysis of factors associated with effective treatment (2005, background): “Weisburd, Lum, and Petrosino (2001), for example, found larger effects in nonrandomized studies of criminal justice programs though, for CBT, Pearson et al. (2002) Effects of CBT for Offenders”
The impact of corrections on re-offending: A review of 'what works': Home Office research study 291 (2005, background): “The literature also indicates that behavioural or cognitive-behavioural treatment methods, including social skills and cognitive skills training programmes, reinforcement and incentive p rogrammes, have proven effectiveness in reducing recidivism (Pearson et al., 2002).”
How effective is the “Reasoning and Rehabilitation” programme in reducing reoffending? A meta-analysis of evaluations in four countries (2006, background): “This is smaller than the effect size (weighted mean r /0.147) found in the previous meta-analysis of seven R&R evaluations (Pearson et al., 2002), which they converted to a 26) decrease in recidivism for R&R programme participants compared to controls.”