The positive effects of cognitive–behavioral programs for offenders: A meta-analysis of factors associated with effective treatment

By Nana A. Landenberger, Mark Lipsey. 2005

841 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/86d30e7cd32ee31aa284bc232d172372f5b6cdae

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. E. Gondolf
2. S. Wilson
3. G. Willis
4. Mark Lipsey
5. J. Wormith
6. J. Levenson
7. Nana A. Landenberger
8. Lawrence W. Sherman

In Sociology and Political Science

1. E. Gondolf
2. S. Wilson
3. G. Willis
4. Mark Lipsey
5. J. Wormith
6. Nana A. Landenberger
7. Lawrence W. Sherman
8. L. Helmus

Citations in the corpus

• The power few: experimental criminology and the reduction of harm (2007, background): “In another example, Landenberger and Lipsey (2005) noted that the effects of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) on recidivism are weaker when fewer CBT sessions are completed than when the full course of treatment is carried out.”
• The Principles of Effective Correctional Treatment Also Apply To Sexual Offenders (2009, methodology): “For juvenile delinquents, community treatment has been more effective than institutional treatment (Lipsey, 1998). For adult offenders, the results have been mixed. Andrews and Bonta (2006) found that community treatment was more effective than institutional treatment, but Landenberger and Lipsey (2”
• The Contribution of Psychiatric Disorder to Juvenile Recidivism (2010, background): “These youths should be referred to specialized interventions directed at reducing recidivism (Chamberlain, 2003; Henggler, Borduin, Schoenwald, Rowland, & Cunningham, 1998; Landenberger & Lipsey, 2005).”
• The weak evidence for batterer program alternatives (2011, background): “A variety of cognitive–behavioral approaches appear to “work” (Landenberger & Lipsey, 2005).”
• Core Implementation Components (2009, background): “Although there is considerable discussion about the adapt-to-adopt advice from Rogers (1995), nearly all of the data indicate that high fidelity implementation of evidence-based programs produce better outcomes for consumers (e.g., Landenberger & Lipsey, 2005).”
• Identities Through Time: An Exploration of Identity Change as a Cause of Desistance (2016, background): “Research has shown that cognitive behavioral therapy is among the most effective in reducing recidivism (Andrews & Bonta, 2010; Landenberger & Lipsey, 2005).”
• THEORETICAL AND RESEARCH SUPPORT FOR THE DULUTH MODEL: A REPLY TO DUTTON AND CORVO (2007, background): “Several research reviews and meta-analyses in the criminal justice field assert that CBT is “ effective ” with violent criminals and criminal populations in general (e.g. (e.g., Landenberger & Lipsey, 2005; Wilson, Bouffard, & MacKenzie, 2005).”
• The Primary Factors that Characterize Effective Interventions with Juvenile Offenders: A Meta-Analytic Overview (2009, background): “…however, focus on a particular program or type of program, such as boot camps (MacKenzie, Wilson, & Kider, 2001), cognitivebehavioral therapy (Landenberger & Lipsey, 2005), prison visitation (Petrosino, Turpin-Petrosino, & Buehler, 2003), family therapy (Latimer, 2001), drug court (Wilson,…”