The Psychological Impact of Prejudice: Implications for Intergroup Contact

By Linda R. Tropp. 2003

202 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/647a35e5ec57a2aa17fc605edec7d382165c2022

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Relationships Between Intergroup Contact and Prejudice Among Minority and Majority Status Groups (2005, background): “Rather, these findings suggest that researchers need to grant greater attention to the perceptions and experiences that are likely to inform group members’ conceptions of their intergroup relationships (see Cohen, 1982; Devine & Vasquez, 1998; Plant, 2004; Swim et al., 2001; Tropp, 2003).”
Group Emotions: Cutting the Gordian Knots Concerning Terms, Levels of Analysis, and Processes (2015, unknown): “…et al. (2013b) X Smith et al. (2007) X Tagar et al. (2011) X Tam et al. (2007) X Tapias et al. (2007) X Tarrant et al. (2009) X Tausch et al. (2011) X Tropp (2003) X Van der Schalk et al. (2011) X Van Leeuwen et al. (2013) X Van Zomeren et al. (2007) X Van Zomeren et al. (2004) X Wang et…”
Imagined Intergroup Contact: Theory, Paradigm and Practice (2009, background): “Turner et al. (2007a) found that participants who were asked to imagine a positive interaction with an elderly person or gay man subsequently expressed more positive attitudes, and stereotyped less, than participants who did not.”
When extended contact opens the door to future contact (2011, background): “Related work suggests that people who have had prior positive contact and crossgroup friendships typically have more positive expectancies for future contact (see Plant, 2004; Tropp, 2003), and that people’s contact experiences are often more positive than they initially anticipate them to be (see M”
Threatened identities and interethnic interactions (2006, background): “Moreover, Verkuyten (2005) found that making multiculturalism salient for Dutch individuals resulted in less derogation of Turkish individuals in the Netherlands compared to making assimilation (colourblindness) salient.”
Diversity Training and Intergroup Contact: A Call to Action Research (2006, background): “Contact research suggests that after coming into contact with people who express bias, individuals from the targeted group will feel worse and will be less willing to interact with any members of the other group, biased or not ( Tropp, 2003 ).”
Cross-Group Friendships and Intergroup Attitudes (2011, background): “intergroup relations, friendship, prejudice, stereotyping, attitudes, close relationships, group processes, interpersonal processes aspects such as number or percentage of outgroup friends (e.g., Paolini et al., 2004; Tropp, 2003).”
Longitudinal effects of contact on intergroup relations: The role of majority and minority group membership and intergroup emotions (2010, background): “The authors argued that, to the extent that intergroup attitudes displayed by minority group members are often biased by prejudice expectations (e.g. Tropp, 2003), individuals belonging to minorities, compared to majority members, may be less convinced that optimal contact conditions are present…”