Diversity Training and Intergroup Contact: A Call to Action Research

By E. Paluck. 2006

225 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Management Science and Operations Research, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/099716e143750bb768ac3179fd0b90c204d2186b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

In Management Science and Operations Research

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

A meta‐analytic evaluation of diversity training outcomes (2013, background): “Subsequently, there have been many attempts at furthering the theoretical basis underlying diversity training (Chavez & Weisinger, 2008; Nemetz & Christiansen, 1996; Paluck, 2006; Wiethoff, 2004).”
The Confronting Prejudiced Responses (CPR) Model: Applying CPR in Organizations (2008, background): “First, in contrast to recent criticisms of diversity training (e.g., Paluck, 2006), the CPR Model is solidly grounded in theory.”
Prejudice in Schools: Promotion of an Inclusive Culture and Climate (2010, background): “Such research must improve upon the methodologies used to empirically validate effective prejudice reduction interventions and explore the barriers to implementing such programs (Paluck, 2006).”
The Dynamics of Acculturation: An Intergroup Perspective (2011, background): “or, rather, should some recognition of group differences be an integral part of any prejudice reduction program in the interests of promoting diversity (Aboud & Fenwick, 1999; Bigler, 1999; Brown &Hewstone, 2005; Paluck, 2006)? These contrasting strategies are well illustrated by the studies reporte”
Mixed Signals: The Unintended Effects of Diversity Initiatives (2019, background): “…program run by the Anti-Defamation League that focused on tolerance did not increase participants’ personal comfort with members of other groups (Paluck, 2006; Paluck & Green, 2006), whereas a field experiment in which an intergroup contact intervention (an Outward Bound camping trip) made no…”
Prejudice reduction: what works? A review and assessment of research and practice. (2009, background): “Another study of norms, a field experiment assessing the Anti-Defamation League Peer Training program (Paluck 2006b), showed that students were able to influence close friends and casual acquaintances in their school with public behaviors such as speaking out against biased jokes.”
Can Evidence Impact Attitudes? Public Reactions to Evidence of Gender Bias in STEM Fields (2015, background): “…responds to calls for psychological research to venture beyond traditional study populations (e.g., the undergraduate subject pool) in order to increase the relevance of results for diverse realworld populations (Ginges, Atran, Sachdeva, & Medin, 2011; Henry, 2008; King et al., 2013; Paluck, 2006).”