The Effect of Common Ground on How Speakers Use Gesture and Speech to Represent Size Information

155 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Language, gesture, action! A test of the Gesture as Simulated Action framework (2010, background): “This idea has received some support from Hostetter and Hopkins (2002), who found that speakers who learned about events from a written description gestured less than speakers who learned about the same events through an animated, spatial cartoon.”
Cross-cultural variation of speech-accompanying gesture: A review (2009, background): “The way gestures use space as the representational medium changes, depending on various communicative and situational contexts (Gullberg, 2006; Holler & Stevens, 2007, 2009; Özyürek, 2002).”
Visible embodiment: Gestures as simulated action (2008, background): “In support of this idea, growing evidence indicates that speakers' gestures are influenced by what their listeners do and do not know (Gerwing & Bavelas, 2004; Holler & Stevens, 2007).”
How Teachers Link Ideas in Mathematics Instruction Using Speech and Gesture: A Corpus Analysis (2014, background): “The finding makes sense in light of other research showing that speakers rely on gesture to communicate spatial information that is not part of the common ground, or the knowledge that they share with their interlocutors (Holler & Stevens, 2007).”