The Unmet Potential of Interdisciplinary Research: Political Psychological Approaches to Voting and Public Opinion

By James N. Druckman, J. Kuklinski, L. Sigelman. 2009

87 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0d93ba9e5f5497f68b4af323ee0326491763af92

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

1. Thomas J. Leeper
2. James N. Druckman
3. Yanna Krupnikov
4. A. Levine

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Thomas J. Leeper
2. James N. Druckman
3. Yanna Krupnikov
4. A. Levine

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Thomas J. Leeper
2. James N. Druckman
3. A. Coppock
4. Kevin Arceneaux
5. Yanna Krupnikov
6. Dan Kahan
7. Sophie Lecheler
8. David E. Broockman

Citations in the corpus

• Dynamic Public Opinion: Communication Effects over Time (2010, unknown): “…individuals tend to hold relatively weak attitudes—they do not carry long-standing attitudes, but instead construct 1 See Chong and Druckman (2007c, 115) and Druckman, Kuklinski, and Sigelman (2009) for discussions of how framing effects are indistinguishable from what many scholars call priming.”
• Learning More from Political Communication Experiments: Pretreatment and Its Effects (2012, background): “3See Chong and Druckman (2007, 115) and Druckman, Kuklinski, and Sigelman (2009) for discussion of how framing effects are indistinguishable from what many scholars call priming. ment environment refers to the context prior to exposing experimental participants to the frame.”