Curbing Foreign Distributor Opportunism: An Examination of Trust, Contracts, and the Legal Environment in International Channel Relationships
By S. Tamer Cavusgil, Seyda Z. Deligonul, Chun Zhang. 2004
318 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/63ca5abeaabf2b0bf46e8e7ae5768e2399675319
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
- Yuan Li
- Mike W. Peng
- En Xie
- Yi Liu
- Rudolf R. Sinkovics
- Yadong Luo
- S. Tamer Cavusgil
- Ruey-Jer "Bryan" Jean
In Economics and Econometrics
- Mike W. Peng
- Yuan Li
- Yadong Luo
- Yi Liu
- En Xie
- Rudolf R. Sinkovics
- Ruey-Jer "Bryan" Jean
- S. Tamer Cavusgil
In Strategy and Management
- Yuan Li
- Mike W. Peng
- En Xie
- Rudolf R. Sinkovics
- Yi Liu
- Ruey-Jer "Bryan" Jean
- S. Tamer Cavusgil
- Yadong Luo
Citations in the corpus
- Impact of specific investments, governance mechanisms and behaviors on the performance of cooperative innovation projects (2017, background): “Second, as FCs specify cheating occasions and related punishments in written form, it serves as a reference point to judge the extent of opportunism (Cavusgil et al., 2004).”
- Overcoming export manufacturers’ dilemma in international expansion (2007, methodology): “operationalization has been adopted in previous work (Cavusgil et al., 2004), and coefficient a for this five-item scale was 0.”
- Governing buyer–supplier relationships through transactional and relational mechanisms: Evidence from China (2009, background): “…and improving relationship performance for participating organizations (Barclay and Brock, 1997; Dahlstrom and Nygaard, 1999; Cannon et al., 2000; Cavusgil et al., 2004; Heide and John, 1992; Jap and Ganesan, 2000; Lusch and Brown, 1996; Poppo and Zenger, 2002; Wuyts and Geyskens, 2005).”
- Formal control and social control in domestic and international buyer–supplier relationships (2010, background): “Contracts are especially important in cross-border relationships because of pronounced differences in the recognition of rights, liabilities, and interpretations of the fine line between breach of contracts and tortuous acts (Cavusgil et al., 2004).”
- The effects of supplier involvement and knowledge protection on product innovation in customer-supplier relationships: a study of global automotive suppliers in China (2014, background): “The literature highlights that trust is better at governing cross-border relationships, because physical and cultural distance undermines the ability of a formal contract to identify and cover each contingency (Cavusgil, Deligonul, and Zhang, 2004).”
- Managing knowledge leakage in strategic alliances: The effects of trust and formal contracts (2013, background): “Surprisingly, although transaction cost analysis prescribes formal contracts as a governance mechanism, we do not find that they significantly affect knowledge leakage, perhaps becausewhen formal contracts are unenforceable (Cavusgil et al., 2004), they cannot significantly affect unintended knowled”