Towards an information systems perspective and research agenda on crowdsourcing for innovation

By Ann Majchrzak, Arvind Malhotra. Journal of strategic information systems, 2013

464 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Computer Science Applications

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/62ec7cccec77cde3b9130a2b8853b3e5e1ec3517

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

In Computer Science Applications

Citations in the corpus

Ethical norms and issues in crowdsourcing practices: A Habermasian analysis (2018, background): “…allocated based on requesters’ open calls placed on information technology (IT) platforms that enable them to access widely distributed “crowds” of workers, their skills and their ideas (e.g., Afuah and Tucci 2012; Estellés-Arolas and González-Ladrón-de-Guevara 2012; Majchrzak and Malhotra 2013).”
Digital product innovation within four classes of innovation networks (2016, background): “As the operant dimension of digitization increases the knowledge heterogeneity of innovation networks (Argyres, 1999; Majchrzak & Malhotra, 2013; Yoo et al ., 2006), the semantic distance of knowledge elements necessary for product innovation grows.”
Digital Entrepreneurship: Toward a Digital Technology Perspective of Entrepreneurship (2017, methodology): “…digital technologies could fundamentally shape the scope and the nature of distributed entrepreneurial agency—for example, new functions offered by the digital infrastructure (e.g., crowdsourcing system) could likely shape the “architecture of participation” (e.g., Majchrzak & Malhotra, 2013).”
Digital Technologies as External Enablers of New Venture Creation in the IT Hardware Sector (2018, background): “This means that the mechanisms that describe their potential actions are situated within the relationship between these technologies and the human actors who interact with them (Leonardi, 2011; Majchrzak & Malhotra, 2013).”
Managing Crowds in Innovation Challenges (2014, background): “When only outcome rewards for best solutions are offered, there is less collaboration among the crowd.(18) Giving rewards for the best solutions tends to drive crowd members to only share their personally derived ideas, rather than knowledge that could be integrated by others.”
Digital Technology Entrepreneurship: A Definition and Research Agenda (2017, background): “…this and related research questions, researchers might take advantage of methods and theoretical perspectives from information systems’ research, where we have seen similar research fields’ intercon-nections in the last years between innovation and information systems (Majchrzak & Malhotra, 2013).”
Crowdsourcing: A Review and Suggestions for Future Research (2018, unknown): “In general terms, crowdsourcing platforms offer extrinsic incentives for outputs while, in some crowdsourcing challenges, there are also incentives linked to how actively people engage in the process (Majchrzak and Malhotra, 2013; Malhotra and Majchrzak, 2014).”
Digital Innovation Management: Reinventing Innovation Management Research in a Digital World (2017, background): “The scope, functionality, and other characteristics of these enabling digital technologies fundamentally shape the scope, content, and direction of the distributed innovation agency (e.g., Chandra and Leenders 2012; Majchrzak and Malhotra 2013; Smith et al. 2013).”
Reflections on societal and business model transformation arising from digitization and big data analytics: A research agenda (2015, background): “According to Luhmann (1993), in such instances, technology ‘fires back’ (i.e., acts on users and social systems in sometimes unforeseen and surprising ways).”