Corporate Political Strategy: An Examination of the Relation between Political Expenditures, Environmental Performance, and Environmental Disclosure
By Charles H. Cho, Dennis M. Patten, Robin W. Roberts. 2006
259 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Marketing, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/62c62bfc70a2704bb6811334be3b7d41052b38ee
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Marketing
- Giovanna Michelon
- C. Mallin
- Charles H. Cho
- Dennis M. Patten
- Michele Fabrizi
- James E. Mattingly
- Li Sun
- Martin Stuebs
In Strategy and Management
- Giovanna Michelon
- Charles H. Cho
- C. Mallin
- Dennis M. Patten
- James E. Mattingly
- Michele Fabrizi
- Albert H. C. Tsang
- Li Sun
Citations in the corpus
- Impression Management in Sustainability Reports: An Empirical Investigation of the Use of Graphs (2012, methodology): “…the KLD data have been used extensively in US management research on corporate social and environmental performance issues (e.g., Waddock and Graves, 1997) and more recently in social and environmental accounting research (see, e.g., Cho et al., 2006; Cho and Patten, 2007; Cho et al., forthcoming).”
- The Role of CEO’s Personal Incentives in Driving Corporate Social Responsibility (2014, background): “…literature on corporate social and environmental performance (see, e.g., Waddock and Graves 1997; Johnson and Greening 1999; Hillman and Keim 2001) as well as in recent social and environmental accounting research (see, e.g., Cho et al. 2006; Cho and Patten 2007; Cho et al. 2010; Cho et al. 2012).”
- Board reputation attributes and corporate social performance: an empirical investigation of the US Best Corporate Citizens (2011, background): “…in the management literature on corporate social and environmental performance (see, e.g. Waddock and Graves 1997, Johnson and Greening 1999, Hillman and Keim 2001, David et al. 2007) as well as recent social and environmental accounting research (see, e.g. Cho et al. 2006, Cho and Patten 2007).”
- An Analysis of Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Performance with Moderating Effects of CEO Power and Ownership Structure: A Case Study of the Manufacturing Sector of Pakistan (2019, background): “The existing research does not give an appropriate answer [15–17].”
- Corporate Social Responsibility Report Narratives and Analyst Forecast Accuracy (2017, background): “…their CSR reports, firms can commit to highquality financial reporting (Chen et al. 2016), perform effective CSR activities (Dawkins and Fraas 2011; Cho et al. 2006; Dhaliwal et al. 2011; Hummel and Schlick & Albert Tsang atsang@schulich.yorku.ca 1 University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA 2…”
- Corporate Social Performance: A Review of Empirical Research Examining the Corporation–Society Relationship Using Kinder, Lydenberg, Domini Social Ratings Data (2017, background): “Cho, Patten, and Roberts (2006) discovered a link between environmental harm and political spending, suggesting that environmentally destructive firms may attempt to repair their reputations, thus restoring legitimacy, by changing the rules of the game, relieving the coercive institutional…”
- Corporate governance and social responsibility (2015, methodology): “Consistent with prior research (Chen et al., 2008; Cho et al., 2006; Deckop et al., 2006; Nelling and Webb, 2009; Ruf et al., 2001; Johnson and Greening, 1999; Griffin and Mahon, 1997; Shropshire and Hillman, 2007; Waddock and Graves, 1997; Graves and Waddock, 1994), we subtract total concerns from ”