Establishing the validity and reliability of course evaluation questionnaires

By David Kember, D. Leung. 2008

130 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/619a96a3b348a194afc3a5390ef6b6296dd7f771

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

1. Bert Brockx
2. O. Bolarinwa
3. D. Mortelmans
4. P. Spooren
5. H. Hornstein
6. M. Goos
7. A. Salomons

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. O. Bolarinwa
2. D. Mortelmans

Citations in the corpus

• On the Validity of Student Evaluation of Teaching (2013, background): “…Workload Instruction Learning Keeley et al. (2006) TBC 2 Caring and supportive Keeley et al. (2010) Professional competency and Communicational skills Kember & Leung (2008) ETCQ 9 Understanding fundamental content Relevance Challenging beliefs Active learning Teacher–student relationships…”
• Principles and methods of validity and reliability testing of questionnaires used in social and health science researches (2015, background): “[3] It is a data collection ‘tool’ for collecting and recording information about a particular issue of interest.[2,5] It should always have a definite purpose that is related to the objectives of the research, and it needs to be clear from the outset on how the findings will be used.”