Issues in the meta‐analysis of cluster randomized trials
By Allan Donner, Neil Klar. Statistics in Medicine, 2002
609 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6113ef0569cccd7853b3df4e873c54e40f0c91a5
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
In Statistics and Probability
- L. Hedges
- S. Freeman
- Hannah Jordt
- Sarah L. Eddy
- Miles J. McDonough
- Michelle K. Smith
- M. Wenderoth
- Nnadozie Okoroafor
Citations in the corpus
- Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics (2014, background): “The element of nonindependence in quasirandom designs can cause variance calculations to underestimate the actual variance, leading to overestimates for significance levels and for the weight that each study is assigned (41).”
- Effect Sizes in Cluster-Randomized Designs (2007, background): “Donner and Klar (2002) suggested that corrections for the effects of clustering should be introduced in meta-analyses of cluster-randomized experiments.”
- Multivariate meta‐analysis: the effect of ignoring within‐study correlation (2009, methodology): “Metaanalysis of cluster randomized trials (Donner and Klar, 2002), of crossover trials (Elbourne et al.”