A Review of Time-Shortened Courses across Disciplines

By E. Daniel. 2000

202 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/602d324e28ff8b849d232183d57259244fc19529

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. John V. Kucsera
2. Dawn Zimmaro
3. Nikki Edgecombe
4. Martin Davies
5. Richard Thomas Watson
6. Petru Lucian Curseu
7. A. Queirós

Citations in the corpus

• Accelerating the Academic Achievement of Students Referred to Developmental Education. CCRC Working Paper No. 30. (2011, background): “Daniel (2000) emphasizes the potential scheduling benefits of “time-shortened” course formats for nontraditional-age college students in her review of the research on intensive courses.”
• Intensive Teaching Formats: A Review. (2006, methodology): “Research using intensive teaching can be found in Language teaching (Buzash, 1994; Deveny & Bookout, 1976; Eller, 1983; Frank, 1973; Keilstrup, 1981), Art Education (Mims, 1983), Literature (Scott, 1994), Engineering and Computer Science (Masat, 1982), Mathematics (Caskey, 1994; Mayo, 2003), Pharmac”
• Comparing the Effectiveness of Intensive and Traditional Courses (2010, background): “Unfortunately, most research addressing differences in the effectiveness of intensive and traditional courses reflects many methodological limitations (Daniel 2000; Seamon 2004).”