Market Value, R&D and Intellectual Property: An Empirical Analysis of Large Australian Firms

By D. Bosworth, M. Rogers. 2001

237 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Finance, Management of Technology and Innovation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5fe366c70895710d62b40d99f2d0c3e44e2c1e7b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Emma García‐Meca
2. Chao‐Hung Wang
3. Feng Liu
4. R. Peterson
5. Jian Xu
6. S. Tanford
7. Jaekyung Lee

In Finance

1. I. Martínez
2. Emma García‐Meca
3. Chao‐Hung Wang
4. Jaeseok Jeong
5. R. Peterson

In Management of Technology and Innovation

1. Chao‐Hung Wang

Citations in the corpus

• The Market Value of R&D, Patents and Trademarks (2011, unknown): “This method is applied in other studies (Bosworth and Rogers, 2001; Greenhalgh and Rogers, 2006, 2007). Second, trademarks may be incorporated in the multiplicative factor qit since they may affect or influence market structures. It has been pointed out that the characteristics of a company’s market”
• Intellectual Capital and Corporate Value in an Emerging Economy: Empirical Study of Taiwanese Manufacturers (2005, unknown): “Empirical studies find the most common measures of firm’s innovation capability are R&D expenditure, patent counts (Bosworth and Rogers, 2001), and statistics on new product introduction (Schoenecker and Swanson, 2002), all of which positively influence market value (H1a).”
• Intellectual Capital, Technological Innovation and Firm Performance: Evidence from China’s Manufacturing Sector (2019, background): “For the mediating variable, scholars generally use four primary indicators to measure technological innovation: (1) R&D expenditure [84,85], (2) patent counts [86], (3) statistics on new product introduction [87], and (4) innovation survey data [14].”
• Exploring the impact of advertising and R&D expenditures on corporate brand value and firm-level financial performance (2010, background): “To the extent that contemporaneous relationships are observed, they may be due to the relative year-to-year stability of the focal variables rather than any implicit cause-and-effect or forward-looking relationships (e.g., Bosworth and Rogers 2001 ), or even any proxy or signaling effects.”
• Trademarks and Venture Capital Valuation (2014, unknown): “Few empirical studies have jointly addressed patents and trademarks (Bosworth and Rogers, 2001; Greenhalgh and Rogers, 2006a; 2006b; Sandner and Block, 2011).”
• Clarifying the Effects of R&D on Performance: Evidence from the High Technology Industries (2011, background): “Other scholars have provided similar arguments, noting that the complexity of R&D activity is unable to immediately reflect on current performance (Boer, 1999), and then the threshold effect of innovation process might occur (Bosworth and Rogers, 2001).”
• Measuring the Returns to R&D: The Depreciation Problem (2005, unknown): “This approach has its origins in the seminal work of Griliches (1981) and has been applied to data from a number of countries: US (Cockburn and Griliches 1987, Hall 1993a,b, Hall and Kim 1999, Chan et al. 2001), UK (Blundell et al. 1999, Bosworth et al. 2000, Toivanen et al. 2002), Australia (Boswor”
• The use of intellectual capital information in investment decisions: An empirical study using analyst reports (2007, background): “Low (2000) and Bosworth and Rogers (2001) confirm that both R&D expenditures and patent activity are positively related to a firm's market value.”