Corporate Social and Financial Performance: An Investigation in the U.K. Supermarket Industry

By G. Moore. 2001

590 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Marketing, Sociology and Political Science, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5f93ae748ec934a00d1b0f84a9635190f197699f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Marketing

In Sociology and Political Science

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Labor-Friendly Corporate Practices: Is What is Good for Employees Good for Shareholders? (2011, background): “See also, Moore (2001), Ruf et al. (2001), and Cennamo et al. (2009) for discussions of stakeholder theory and corporate performance.”
The Creation of Value Through Corporate Reputation (2007, background): “• Sector of activity: Differences in the existing economic indicators between the different sectors would mask any relationship of social performance with FP, and so this factor should be taken into account when performing an empirical test, either by limiting it to companies in the same sector (Gri”
Transformational leadership, corporate social responsibility, organizational innovation, and organizational performance: Symmetrical and asymmetrical analytical approaches (2018, background): “…has grown exponentially in recent years (Bernal-Conesa et al., 2016; Briones Peñalver et al., n.d.; Cuadrado佻 Ballesteros et al., 2017; Farrington et al., 2017; Herrera, 2015; Marin et al., 2017; Moore, 2001; Saeidi et al., 2015; Sun and Stuebs, 2013; Wang et al., 2015; Wiengarten et al., 2015).”
Does Corporate Social Responsibility Affect the Performance of Firms (2012, unknown): “In this last case, some social indices, credit ratings provided by social institutions, such as EIRIS or KLD, or ad hoc indices drawn up by the researchers themselves (Beliveau et al., 1994, Brammer et al., 2007, Hillman et al., 2001; Johnson and Greening, 1999; Mahoney and Thorne, 2005; Moore, 2001”
It’s who you know that counts: Board connectedness and CSR performance (2020, background): “This information advantage allows directors to provide deeper insights into evolving market conditions, predict upcoming trends (Mizruchi, 1996; Moore, 2001), and reduce the information gap among different stakeholders (Schoorman et al., 1981).”
When CEO Career Horizon Problems Matter for Corporate Social Responsibility: The Moderating Roles of Industry-Level Discretion and Blockholder Ownership (2016, methodology): “We also controlled for Company Age since company age is significantly associated with CSR (Moore 2001).”
An Integrated Model to Explain How Corporate Social Responsibility Affects Corporate Financial Performance (2015, background): “In addition, Moore [77] indicated that determining the relationship between CSR and financial performance using accounting-based instead of market-based measures is more appropriate in terms of the detection purpose, particularly ROA.”
“Triple Bottom Line” as “Sustainable Corporate Performance”: A Proposition for the Future (2010, methodology): “the overall index using the score of 0–10 [35].”