EDITORIAL: ATTITUDES CAN BE MEASURED! BUT WHAT IS AN ATTITUDE?

By Bertram Gawronski. 2007

150 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Marketing, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5f1023205703fdf49ff825008cd39c91b1e665b4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Bertram Gawronski
2. J. de Houwer
3. Galen Bodenhausen
4. Agnes Moors
5. D. Barnes-Holmes
6. Akie Yada
7. H. Savolainen
8. Sarah Teige-Mocigemba

In Marketing

1. J. de Houwer
2. Akie Yada
3. Galen Bodenhausen
4. H. Savolainen
5. D. Barnes-Holmes
6. Adriaan Spruyt
7. Bertram Gawronski

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Bertram Gawronski
2. J. de Houwer
3. D. Barnes-Holmes
4. Galen Bodenhausen
5. Agnes Moors
6. Akie Yada
7. Adriaan Spruyt
8. Sarah Teige-Mocigemba

Citations in the corpus

• Unraveling the Processes Underlying Evaluation: Attitudes from the Perspective of the Ape Model (2007, background): “Moreover, both types of responses are “real” in the sense that they reflect evaluative reactions to a given object that have behavioral consequences (e.g., Dovidio, Kawakami, Johnson, Johnson, & Howard, 1997; Fazio et al., 1995; Hofmann, Rauch, & Gawronski, 2007; McConnell & Leibold, 2001).”
• Japanese in-service teachers’ attitudes toward inclusive education and self-efficacy for inclusive practices (2017, background): “However, proper definitions have been actively debated, with the adoption of different views on whether attitudes are trait-like dispositions stored permanently in the memory or momentary judgments constructed from information (Gawronski, 2007).”
• A functional-cognitive framework for attitude research (2013, background): “Because of these constraints, attitude researchers have rightfully devoted a lot of attention to the question of how attitudes are represented (for an overview, see Gawronski, 2007).”
• Consensus on conceptualizations and definitions of trust: Are we there yet? (2015, unknown): “…nitions of many common psychological constructs , such as norms (Cancian, 1975 ; Gibbs, 1965 ; Interis, 2011 ), attitudes (Eagly & Chaiken, 2007 ; Gawronski, 2007 ), motivation and goals (Elliot & Niesta, 2009 ; Hasan & Hynds, 2014 ; Kleinginna & Kleinginna, 1981b ; Winter, John, Stewart,…”
• Implicit measures: A normative analysis and review. (2009, background): “Social Cognition, 22, 673–684.”