Self-conscious emotions: Embarrassment, pride, shame, and guilt.

By M. Lewis. 2008

925 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5eb81d4d91ad5583f8ba57d87f8184519af3222c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Cross-Domain Effects of Guilt on Desire for Self-Improvement Products (2015, background): “…where they individuals have difficulty distinguishing among the different self-conscious emotions and often use the terms interchangeably in everyday language (Lewis 2010; Tangney et al. 1996), we presented participants with a short definition of the respective emotions before the recall procedure.”
Experience Sampling Methods: A Discussion of Critical Trends and Considerations for Scholarly Advancement (2018, background): “For example, shame and guilt differ with respect to their attributions and action tendencies (Lazarus, 1991; Lewis, 2000), yet multi-item measures of guilt include items such as “ashamed” (Watson & Clark, 1994).”
The Hourglass of Emotions (2011, methodology): “Therefore, the Hourglass model systematically excludes what are variously known as self-conscious or moral emotions such as pride, guilt, shame, embarrassment, moral outrage, or humiliation [34–37].”
Emotions and goals: Assessing relations between values and emotions (2007, background): “Whereas pride involves a positive evaluation of the self, shame and guilt involve negative self-evaluations, often following failures to live up to moral or social standards (Lewis, 2000).”
The role of hedonism in ethical tourism (2014, background): “These emotions, expressed through feelings of arrogance or superiority, can impede moral behaviour as individuals tend to view themselves in a superior light and above reprieve (Lewis, 2000).”
The Norm Activation Model: An exploration of the functions of anticipated pride and guilt in pro-environmental behaviour (2013, background): “These emotions are evoked by evaluations of one’s self after following (or failing to follow) personal or social standards (Lewis, 1993; Tracy & Robins, 2004).”
A Naturalist’s View of Pride (2010, background): “However, in the past decade, a growing body of research on pride has emerged; new theories and findings suggest that pride is a psychologically important and evolutionarily adaptive emotion (e.g., Lewis, 2000; Tiedens, Ellsworth, & Mesquita, 2000; Tracy & Robins, 2007a; Williams & DeSteno, 2008).”
Consequences of knowledge hiding: The differential compensatory effects of guilt and shame (2018, background): “Guilt motivates perpetrators to help their victim, compensate for their transgressions, and engage in reparative actions (Haidt, 2003; Ilies et al., 2013; Lewis, 1993; Tangney et al., 2007).”
Orbitofrontal Cortex and Social Behavior: Integrating Self-monitoring and Emotion-Cognition Interactions (2006, background): “A critical relation between these two theories is suggested by functional accounts of emotion, which posit that self-monitoring is necessary for generating social emotions that help promote adaptive social behavior (Lewis, 1993).”
Bridging the Gap between Social Animal and Unsocial Machine: A Survey of Social Signal Processing (2012, unknown): “Social emotions are those related to social relations [65], for instance, pride, shame, or embarrassment or those felt toward someone else, like hate, envy, contempt, admiration [66], [67].”
The Meaning of My Feelings Depends on Who I Am: Work-Related Identifications Shape Emotion Effects in Organizations (2017, background): “Perhaps the emotion of guilt turned to shame (a more negative holistic self-focused emotion, Lewis, 2008) when employees felt a strong self-overlap with both the organization and the occupation, thus counteracting the need to repair with a need for withdrawal.”
The Role of Moral Emotions in Military Trauma: Implications for the Study and Treatment of Moral Injury (2014, background): “In advancing a working definition of moral injury, Litz et al. (2009) and other proponents of this emerging construct are not advocating for a new disorder or descriptive diagnosis. Instead, Litz et al.’s definition affirms the existence of traumatic events that extend beyond the realm of fear and i”
Restore and protect motivations following shame (2010, background): “Shame is perhaps the most important self-conscious emotion (Lewis, 2000; Lindsay-Hartz, 1984), playing a role in many personal and interpersonal domains of social being such as self-esteem, shyness, eating disturbances, depression, development, and self-regulation (Erikson, 1963; Harder, 1995; Harde”
Explaining Group Influence: The Role of Identity and Emotion in Political Conformity and Polarization (2015, background): “According to others, those who exemplify shared community ideals tend to be treated with respect and admired (Lewis 2000), whereas norm breakers are often subject to derogation (or shaming) (Marques, Abrams, and Serôdio 2001).”
Handbook of the psychology of self-forgiveness (2017, methodology): “, Maltby, Macaskill, & Day, 2001; Thompson et al., 2005) or (2) an end-state of self-forgiveness where individuals have disposed of their selfcondemnation, and instead show high compassion, love, and generosity toward the self (Wohl et al., 2008). Hall and Fincham (2005) identified this problem, not”