Evaluation and Organizational Learning: Past, Present, and Future

By R. T. Torres, H. Preskill. 2001

241 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

An overview of appreciative inquiry in evaluation (2003, background): “…participation may vary from one evaluation to another, there is little doubt that evaluators are increasingly involving stakeholders in various phases of evaluation practice (Cousins and Whitmore, 1998; Ryan and Johnson, 2000; Shulha and Cousins, 1997; Torres and Preskill, 2001; Weiss, 1998).”
An Integrated Model of Training Evaluation and Effectiveness (2004, background): “…Box 161390, Orlando, Florida 32816-1390. e-mail: kayealvarez@bellsouth.net or esalas@ist.ucf.edu Human Resource Development Review Vol. 3, No. 4 December 2004 385-416 DOI: 10.1177/1534484304270820 © 2004 Sage Publications Baldwin, 2000; Kraiger, 2002; Noe & Colquitt, 2002; Torres & Preskill, 2001).”
An Exploratory Study of Process Use: Findings and Implications for Future Research (2003, unknown): “…(Cousins & Whitmore, 1998; Fetterman, 2000; O’Sullivan & O’Sullivan, 1998; Owen & Rogers, 1999; Patton, 1997; Preskill & Caracelli, 1997; Preskill & Torres, 1999; Rossman & Rallis, 2000; Ryan & Johnson, 2000; Shulha & Cousins, 1997; Shulha & Wilson, 2003; Torres & Preskill, 2001; Weiss, 1998).”
Leadership Style and Organizational Learning: The Mediate Effect of School Vision. (2010, background): “Systematic use of assessment mechanisms is a necessary condition for organizational learning in school and its improvement (e.g. Silins et al., 2002; Torres and Preskill, 2001).”