The Gateway to the Profession: Assessing Teacher Preparation Programs Based on Student Achievement. CEDR Working Paper No. 2011-2.0.

183 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Does Preservice Preparation Matter? Examining an Old Question in New Ways (2014, background): “Recent evidence for meaningful differences between preparation programs in terms of their graduates’ effectiveness, however, has renewed interest in the promise of preservice training (Boyd et al., 2009; Gansle et al., 2012; Goldhaber et al., 2012).”
Does the Match Matter? Exploring Whether Student Teaching Experiences Affect Teacher Effectiveness (2017, methodology): “Likewise, if TEPs are more likely to send their most motivated and/or high-quality student teachers to schools where the principal graduated from that TEP, then the exclusion restriction is violated for the second IV.13 Under the exclusion restriction, we can use the first-stage coefficients estimat”
Field Placement Schools and Instructional Effectiveness (2015, background): “Many have assumed that the effects of teacher preparation likely matter only during the first few years, but Goldhaber, Liddle, and Theobald (2013) found that preparation effects persist.”