R&D co-operation and innovation a microeconometric study on French firms
By S. Negassi. 2004
200 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5b885190fb86b8f283da15f4f5febcd21f75ff9b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- V. Scalera
- M. Schwartz
- Mattia Bianchi
- Oliver Gassmann
- Andrés Barge-Gil
- Fang-Chi Huang
- Elif Bascavusoglu-Moreau
- Andrea Mina
Citations in the corpus
- Open service innovation and the firm's search for external knowledge (2014, result): “Overall, among the firm-level characteristics associated with „openness‟, our results confirm that cooperation tends to increase with R&D intensity (Fritsch & Lukas, 2001; Negassi, 2004; Veugelers, 1997).”
- What drives innovation output from subsidized R&D cooperation?—Project-level evidence from Germany (2012, background): “It is therefore reasonable to assume that the intended commercialization (or exploitation) range of R&D cooperation affects innovation incentives (Negassi, 2004) and, therefore, the innovation output of R&D cooperation projects.”
- Innovation and SMEs: Misaligned perspectives and goals among entrepreneurs, academics, and policy makers (2008, background): “…and Grupp, 2005; Jaffe and Trajtenberg, 2002), information disseminated in literature (Sorenson and Fleming, 2004), the absolute amount of sales of innovative products (Negassi, 2004), the number of innovations (Brower and Kleinknecht, 1996), and the increase in market share (Mascitelli, 2000).”
- Cooperation in innovation activities: The importance of partners (2010, background): “more able it should be to access and implement a greater amount of knowledge ( Negassi, 2004; Schmidt, 2005).”
- Determinants and Archetype Users of Open Innovation (2009, background): “R&D intensity is measured as the percentage of the firm’s R&D employees as a fraction of all employees for the respective time period (Negassi, 2004).”
- The role of absorptive capacity in facilitating "open innovation" outcomes: A study of Australian SMEs in the manufacturing sector (2009, background): “This finding is consistent with previous studies that have tended to report a weak effect of R&D collaboration on innovation output (Brouwer and Kleinknecht, 1996; Negassi, 2004).”
- Making sense of innovation by R&D and non-R&D innovators in low technology contexts: a forgotten lesson for policymakers (2011, unknown): “This is also confirmed in Nieto and Quevedo (2005), Veugelers (1999), Cassiman and Veugelers (2006) and Hervas and Albors (2009).”
- The nature of SME co-operation and innovation: A multi-scalar and multi-dimensional analysis (2013, unknown): “However, where strong and close co-operative ties exist, firms are more likely to engage in resource pooling and joint action on technological development, thus collectively improving the appropriability of innovations along the supply chain (Harabi, 1998; Negassi, 2004).”
- Open, Semi-Open and Closed Innovators: Towards an Explanation of Degree of Openness (2010, background): “Exceptions include Becker and Dietz ( 2004 ), Negassi ( 2004 ), Barge-Gil ( 2010 ) and de Faria et al.”
- R&D Subsidies as Dual Signals in Technological Collaborations (2019, background): “A larger endowment makes the firm more attractive to would-be partners, which are more likely to join forces due to the resource contributions the signaler might bring to the collaboration (Hitt et al., 2004; Negassi, 2004).”
- International Entrepreneurship Leveraging Internal and External Knowledge Sources (2009, unknown): “This is corroborated by Negassi (2004), whose fi ndings highlighted the necessity of fi rms to have suffi cient absorptive capacity to either attract partners in collaborative arrangements or benefi t fully from externally sourced knowledge.”