Understanding Student Evaluations: What All Faculty Should Know

By S. Hobson, D. Talbot. 2001

117 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Management of Technology and Innovation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5b04d9ee9fd779b12be048e84bab1591a34cf371

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

1. John Beattie
2. T. Baldwin
3. B. Algozzine
4. Marty Bray
5. Lisa D Howley
6. Claudia Flowers
7. J. Gretes
8. G. Mohanty

In Management of Technology and Innovation

1. T. Baldwin
2. N. Blattner

Citations in the corpus

• Guarding Against Potential Bias in Student Evaluations: What Every Faculty Member Needs to Know (2003, background): “…and have been the subject of numerous studies (Basow 2000; Basow and Howe 1987; Elmore and LaPointe 1974; Harris 1975; Henebry and Diamond 1998; Hobson and Talbot 2001; Kierstead, D’Angostino, and Dill 1988; McKeachie and Lin 1971; Swim et al. 1989; Tatro 1995; Tieman and Rankin-Ullock 1985;…”
• Student Evaluation of Teaching Effectiveness: An assessment of student perception and motivation (2003, background): “Evidence from many studies indicates that most universities and colleges throughout the world use student ratings of instruction as part of their evaluation of teaching effectiveness (Seldin, 1985; Abrami, 1989; Wagenaar, 1995; Abrami et al., 2001; Hobson & Talbot, 2001).”
• Student Ratings of Teaching : A Summary of Research and Literature (2012, unknown): “…and that various dimensions should be used when their purpose is to improve teaching, there is disagreement about how many and which dimensions should be used for personnel decisions (Apodaca & Grad, 2005; Harrison, Douglas, & Burdsal, 2004; Hobson & Talbot, 2001; Renaud & Murray, 2005).”
• Student Evaluation Of College Teaching: A Practice In Search Of Principles (2004, background): “Despite discrepancies in opinions about the usefulness of SETs, their use will likely continue, and faculty members interested in improving outcomes related to SETs are advised to consider the recommendations provided by Hobson and Talbot (2001): 1.”
• Student evaluation of instruction in higher education: exploring issues of validity and reliability (2012, unknown): “In the study of Hobson and Talbot (2001), the researchers pointed out that reliability-related research on student evaluation instrument was mostly specific to a single instrument.”