Student Evaluation of Teaching Effectiveness: An assessment of student perception and motivation

By Yining Chen, Leon B. Hoshower. 2003

387 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d646a1cb72771d93e0ac7a6bd1c68f43bdcf53e0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

Citations in the corpus

Moving from Marketization to Marketing of Higher Education: The Co-Creation of Value in Higher Education. (2014, background): “Overall, Choy and Cheah (2009) found that teachers in higher education perceive that they are teaching critical thinking skills to their students, when they actually do not understand the requirements needed to cultivate critical thinking among students. The movement to a critical thinking curricula”
Teacher professionalism and student evaluation of teaching: will better teachers receive higher ratings and will better students give higher ratings? (2006, background): “Despite the intensive use of evaluation questionnaires ( Chen & Hoshower, 2003, Wolfer & Johnson, 2003), assessing teaching is far from evident in many cases: ‘Student ratings of university teachers have been common for at least thirty years, but it is a rare campus where they are accepted with equ”
Improving higher education practice through student evaluation systems: is the student voice being heard? (2014, background): “Chen and Hoshower (2003) report that students see the most important outcome of completing evaluations as them offering meaningful feedback that will lead to an improvement in lecturers’ teaching practice; however, this does not mean that all feedback has agency or that merely following student…”
Factors influencing success in first-year accounting at a South African university: A comparison between lecturers’ assumptions and students’ perceptions (2009, background): “…that students are able to provide valuable information on teaching effectiveness, there is also consensus that students are not able to judge all aspects of faculty performance as they may not be knowledgeable on what is of importance within a particular subject area (Chen & Hoshower, 2003).”
From performativity to professionalism: lecturers’ responses to student feedback (2009, background): “Student evaluations of their learning experience have become an important means of judging the performance of both lecturers and universities (Chen and Hoshower 2003 ; Murray 1997 ).”
Building effectiveness in teaching through targeted evaluation and response: connecting evaluation to teaching improvement in higher education (2008, background): “…demonstrated through this pilot project, is the possibility of increasing students’ perceptions that evaluation activities have, are and will be used to enhance the teacher’s practices and the course design; these are the two outcomes of evaluation that students value most (Chen and Hoshower 2003).”
On the Validity of Student Evaluation of Teaching (2013, methodology): “Using SET for administrative decision-making was not found to be an important motivator for student participation in SET (Chen & Hoshower, 2003).”
Student evaluation of courses: what predicts satisfaction? (2010, background): “Of these factors, several studies have indicated that students think that those related to improving teaching quality are significantly more important than those aimed at improving course content (see Chen & Hoshower, 2003 ).”