Student evaluation of instruction in higher education: exploring issues of validity and reliability

By Jing Zhao, Dorinda J. Gallant. 2012

100 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Education, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9704914b12381fa9b9217fc650c0987b6c1c3719

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

1. Keisha Valdez Noel
2. Erik Blair

In Social Psychology

1. Erik Blair

Citations in the corpus

• Assessing quality assurance in higher education: quality managers’ perceptions of effectiveness (2018, background): “…that evaluation results do not reliably and validly reflect teaching quality and can thus not be used as a basis for management decisions, particularly when these management decisions have budgetary relevance (for an overview, see Pohlenz 2009; Shevlin et al. 2000; Zhao and Gallant 2012).”
• Improving higher education practice through student evaluation systems: is the student voice being heard? (2014, background): “Judicious use of such feedback can lead to improvements in practice (Ballantyne, Borthwick, and Packer 2000; Yao and Grady 2005; Zhao and Gallant 2012) only when it is accompanied by institutional and individual ambition (Kember, Leung, and Kwan 2002; Marsh 2007).”