The impact of the feedback source on developing oral presentation competence
By S. V. van Ginkel, Judith T. M. Gulikers, Harm J. A. Biemans, Martin Mulder. 2017
90 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5af92792b44b0883f5934e0eb2f4f925134bdc4f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
- Ernesto Panadero
- Tammy Schellens
- Tijs Rotsaert
- C. Hunter
- Rurik Tywoniw
- Yao Xiong
- Xiuyan Guo
- Hongli Li
Citations in the corpus
- Does peer assessment promote student learning? A meta-analysis (2020, background): “…et al. (2007) 1 E Undergraduate Introduction to work psychology Exam van Dulmen et al. (2014) 1 E Post-graduate Physical therapy Clinical practice van Ginkel et al. (2015) 4 Q Undergraduate Forest and Nature conservation ; Nutrition and Health Oral presentation Wang et al. (2017) 2 Q Junior…”
- Anonymity as an instructional scaffold in peer assessment: its effects on peer feedback quality and evolution in students’ perceptions about peer assessment skills (2018, background): “For example, in a study by van Ginkel et al. (2015), the added value of a teacher in questioning, intervening, and guiding students in the feedback process led to higher quality feedback.”